Bone mineral density (BMD)
Eldecalcitol → Bone mineral density (BMD)
Eldecalcitol → Bone mineral density (BMD)
Evidence profile
Key finding
Hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.17; P=0.39
This study evaluated the effectiveness of eldecalcitol in preventing type 2 diabetes in adults with impaired glucose tolerance. It found no significant difference in diabetes incidence between eldecalcitol and placebo groups.
Evidence strength
Moderate confidence
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
Population
Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes
Intervention
Eldecalcitol, Placebo
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Primary outcome
Incidence of type 2 diabetes
Comparator
Placebo group
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated the effectiveness of eldecalcitol in preventing type 2 diabetes in adults with impaired glucose tolerance. It found no significant difference in diabetes incidence between eldecalcitol and placebo groups.
Understanding whether eldecalcitol can prevent type 2 diabetes is crucial, especially for individuals with impaired glucose tolerance who are at higher risk. The findings suggest that while eldecalcitol may improve bone health, it may not be effective for diabetes prevention, highlighting the need for alternative strategies in managing diabetes risk.
The study's follow-up duration may not capture long-term effects. Results may not be generalizable to populations outside the study sample. Effectiveness of eldecalcitol for diabetes prevention remains unclear.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Tetsuya K, Gen S, Shoichi M, et al. Eldecalcitol for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in adults with impaired glucose tolerance: a randomized controlled trial. The BMJ. 2022;377:e066222. doi:10.1136/bmj-2021-066222
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
Eldecalcitol group had a 12.5% incidence of type 2 diabetes compared to 14.2% in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.87).
23.0% of eldecalcitol participants achieved regression to normoglycaemia versus 20.1% in the placebo group (hazard ratio 1.15).
Bone mineral density of lumbar spine and femoral neck significantly increased with eldecalcitol (P<0.001).
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Eldecalcitol and Bone mineral density (BMD), Regression to normoglycaemia, Serum osteocalcin, and 1 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Eldecalcitol
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
1
Related topics
4
Evidence pairs
3
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Eldecalcitol → Bone mineral density (BMD)
Eldecalcitol → Bone mineral density (BMD)
Evidence profile
Eldecalcitol → Regression to normoglycaemia
Eldecalcitol → Regression to normoglycaemia
Evidence profile
Eldecalcitol → Serum osteocalcin
Eldecalcitol → Serum osteocalcin
Evidence profile
Eldecalcitol → Type 2 diabetes incidence
Eldecalcitol → Type 2 diabetes incidence
Evidence profile
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Eldecalcitol and Bone Mineral Density, Eldecalcitol and Serum osteocalcin.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring Bone Mineral Density
Measures Bone Mineral Density as a key outcome.
All studies on Eldecalcitol
Contributes to Eldecalcitol evidence base.
All studies measuring Serum osteocalcin
Measures Serum osteocalcin as a key outcome.
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Eldecalcitol appears to improve Bone mineral density (BMD).
ConsensusScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Bone mineral density (BMD)
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 55.7 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Eldecalcitol appears to improve Serum osteocalcin.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Serum osteocalcin
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 55.7 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Eldecalcitol for Regression to normoglycaemia.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Regression to normoglycaemia
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 38.1 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Eldecalcitol for Type 2 diabetes incidence.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Type 2 diabetes incidence
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 38.1 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.