Last updated June 14, 2026
Key finding
Overall mean postprandial blood glucose levels were lower after IW3 compared to CON (10.3±3.0 vs. 11.1±3.3 mmol/L; P < 0.05).
This study investigated the effects of interval walking on postprandial glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes, finding significant improvements with one of the walking interventions.
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study investigated the effects of interval walking on postprandial glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes, finding significant improvements with one of the walking interventions.
Improving postprandial glycemic control is crucial for managing type 2 diabetes and reducing the risk of complications. This study suggests that incorporating interval walking into daily routines may be a simple and effective strategy for patients to better manage their blood glucose levels.
The study design was non-randomized, which may introduce bias. Sample size and demographic characteristics were not specified. Results may not be generalizable to all individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Ida J, Thomas PJS, Kristian K, Shahrad T. Interval walking improves postprandial glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0163562. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163562
Postprandial blood glucose levels were significantly lower after IW3 compared to the control (10.3±3.0 vs. 11.1±3.3 mmol/L; P < 0.05).
There was no significant difference in postprandial glucose levels between IW1 and the control group (P > 0.05).
Postprandial glucose levels after IW3 were significantly lower at specific time points compared to the control.
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Interval walking and Postprandial blood glucose.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Interval walking
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
2
Related topics
1
Evidence pairs
256
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Primary evidence
Evidence relationship
Related evidence
Evidence topic
Save evidence
Evidence topic
Save evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Interval walking → Postprandial blood glucose
Interval walking → Postprandial blood glucose
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Aerobic Exercise and Postprandial and OGTT Glucose.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Physical Activity
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies on Aerobic Exercise
Contributes to Aerobic Exercise evidence base.
All studies measuring Postprandial and OGTT Glucose
Measures Postprandial and OGTT Glucose as a key outcome.
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Aerobic Exercise may improve Postprandial and OGTT Glucose.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Ranked evidence signals
Postprandial blood glucose
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.
