Key finding
The primary objective is to assess the cumulative incidence of T2DM over a 36-month follow-up period.
This study will investigate a lifestyle intervention aimed at preventing type 2 diabetes in Asian women with a history of gestational diabetes.
Evidence strength
Moderate confidence
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
Population
Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes
Intervention
Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS)
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Primary outcome
Cumulative incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)
Comparator
Standard postnatal care
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study will investigate a lifestyle intervention aimed at preventing type 2 diabetes in Asian women with a history of gestational diabetes.
Understanding how lifestyle interventions can prevent type 2 diabetes in women with a history of gestational diabetes is crucial, as this population is at increased risk. Effective strategies could lead to better long-term health outcomes for mothers and their families.
Results data are pending, limiting current conclusions. The study population may not be generalizable beyond Asian women. Potential confounding factors may not be fully controlled.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Phaik LQ, He S, Wee MH, et al. Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS) study. Trials. 2026. doi:10.1186/s13063-026-09516-7
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
The study will assess the cumulative incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus over 36 months.
It will evaluate the incidence of prediabetes at 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-ups.
Longitudinal changes in cardiometabolic risk factors will be monitored from 6 to 36 months.
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS) and Cost-effectiveness assessment, Dietary intake changes, Gestational diabetes mellitus incidence, and 2 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS)
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
2
Related topics
5
Evidence pairs
55
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS) → Cost-effectiveness assessment
Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS) → Cost-effectiveness assessment
Evidence profile
Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS) → Dietary intake changes
Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS) → Dietary intake changes
Evidence profile
Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS) → Gestational diabetes mellitus incidence
Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS) → Gestational diabetes mellitus incidence
Evidence profile
Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS) → Longitudinal changes in cardiometabolic risk factors
Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS) → Longitudinal changes in cardiometabolic risk factors
Evidence profile
Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS) → Physical activity changes
Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS) → Physical activity changes
Evidence profile
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS) and Diabetes Incidence and Prevention.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring Diabetes Incidence and Prevention
Measures Diabetes Incidence and Prevention as a key outcome.
All studies on Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS)
Contributes to Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS) evidence base.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
1 results
1 results
1 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS) appears to improve Gestational diabetes mellitus incidence.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Gestational diabetes mellitus incidence
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 54.2 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS) for Cost-effectiveness assessment.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Cost-effectiveness assessment
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 36.6 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS) for Dietary intake changes.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Dietary intake changes
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 36.6 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivized Postnatal Surveillance (IHIPS) for Longitudinal changes in cardiometabolic risk factors.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Longitudinal changes in cardiometabolic risk factors
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 36.6 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.
