Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Liraglutide may reduce stroke recurrence in type 2 diabetes patients

Key finding

Hazard ratio, 0.56 (95% CI, 0.34-0.91); P = .02

This study investigated the effects of liraglutide on stroke recurrence in patients with type 2 diabetes, finding a lower rate of recurrence compared to the control group.

Evidence strength

Moderate confidence

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Medium-Term (3–12 mo)

Some Concerns bias
Last updated July 6, 2026

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

Population

Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes

Intervention

Liraglutide

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Medium-Term (3–12 mo)

Primary outcome

Stroke recurrence

Comparator

Standard treatment

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study investigated the effects of liraglutide on stroke recurrence in patients with type 2 diabetes, finding a lower rate of recurrence compared to the control group.

Clinical relevance

The findings suggest that liraglutide not only aids in diabetes management but may also play a crucial role in reducing the risk of stroke recurrence. This is significant for clinicians as it highlights the potential of liraglutide to improve patient outcomes in a population at high risk for vascular events.

Keep in mind

The study's sample size may limit the generalizability of the findings. The follow-up period of 90 days may not capture long-term outcomes. Potential confounding factors were not fully controlled for in the analysis.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Huili Z, Bin Y, Longyan L, et al. Liraglutide and Stroke Recurrence in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2025;186(1):46-54. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.5684

Save this study and add notes to your research library.

Main Effects

Liraglutide reduced stroke recurrence to 7.9% compared to 13.8% in the control group (p=0.02).

The incidence of ischemic stroke was lower in the liraglutide group at 7.6% versus 13.5% in controls (p=0.02).

A higher proportion of patients achieved a modified Rankin Scale score of ≤ 1 in the liraglutide group (87.3%) compared to controls (77.8%).

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Liraglutide and Acute pancreatitis, All-cause mortality, Gastrointestinal disorders incidence, and 8 more.

Primary intervention

Liraglutide

Primary outcomes

  • Acute pancreatitis
  • All-cause mortality
  • Gastrointestinal disorders incidence

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

11
Evidence pairs
11
Relationships
3
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 72

3

Related topics

11

Evidence pairs

85

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 11 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 3 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

NoneNo Change

Acute pancreatitis

Liraglutide → Acute pancreatitis

Liraglutide → Acute pancreatitis

Evidence profile

NoneNo ChangeClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details
NoneDecrease

All-cause mortality

Liraglutide → All-cause mortality

Liraglutide → All-cause mortality

Evidence profile

NoneDecreaseClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details
HarmfulIncrease

Gastrointestinal disorders incidence

Liraglutide → Gastrointestinal disorders incidence

Liraglutide → Gastrointestinal disorders incidence

Evidence profile

HarmfulIncreaseSafety
Unlock full evidence details
NoneNo Change

Hemorrhagic stroke

Liraglutide → Hemorrhagic stroke

Liraglutide → Hemorrhagic stroke

Evidence profile

NoneNo ChangeClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details
NoneNo Change

Hypoglycemia events

Liraglutide → Hypoglycemia events

Liraglutide → Hypoglycemia events

Evidence profile

NoneNo ChangeSafety
Unlock full evidence details
StrongDecrease

Incidence of vascular events within 90 days

Liraglutide → Incidence of vascular events within 90 days

Liraglutide → Incidence of vascular events within 90 days

Evidence profile

StrongDecreaseClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details
StrongDecrease

Ischemic stroke

Liraglutide → Ischemic stroke

Liraglutide → Ischemic stroke

Evidence profile

StrongDecreaseClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details
StrongIncrease

Modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 1

Liraglutide → Modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 1

Liraglutide → Modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 1

Evidence profile

StrongIncreaseClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details
NoneNo Change

Pneumonia

Liraglutide → Pneumonia

Liraglutide → Pneumonia

Evidence profile

NoneNo ChangeClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details
StrongDecrease

Stroke recurrence

Liraglutide → Stroke recurrence

Liraglutide → Stroke recurrence

Evidence profile

StrongDecreaseClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details
NoneNo Change

Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage

Liraglutide → Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage

Liraglutide → Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage

Evidence profile

NoneNo ChangeClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details

Unlock full evidence analysis

Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • Stroke recurrence was reduced by 0.56 events with liraglutide (p=0.02).
  • Ischemic stroke incidence decreased by 0.55 events in the liraglutide group (p=0.02).
  • Patients on liraglutide had 1.95 times higher odds of achieving better recovery outcomes.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Adults aged 40-75 with type 2 diabetes.
  • Patients with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • Results may not apply to younger populations or those without diabetes.
  • The study did not include patients with acute pancreatitis.
  • Findings are based on a short follow-up period, necessitating further research.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • The study's sample size may limit the generalizability of the findings.
  • The follow-up period of 90 days may not capture long-term outcomes.
  • Potential confounding factors were not fully controlled for in the analysis.

Unlock Full Analysis

Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.

Already have an account?

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Ischemic stroke, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 1.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Archive

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does GLP-1 Receptor Agonists improve cardiovascular outcomes?

Emerging Evidence

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists may improve Cardiovascular Outcomes.

ConsensusScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    All-cause mortality

    EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 34.2 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 9 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
9 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does GLP-1 Receptor Agonists affect hypoglycemia?

Limited Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Hypoglycemia.

ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Hypoglycemia events

    EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 34.2 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 11 supporting studies and existing graph evidence signals.

Limitations

  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
11 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does GLP-1 Receptor Agonists affect gastrointestinal adverse events?

Limited Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Gastrointestinal Adverse Events.

ConsensusScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.

Evidence caveat: The available evidence reports mixed findings.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Gastrointestinal disorders incidence

    EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 25.4 | moderate negative | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
4 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Liraglutide improve incidence of vascular events within 90 days?

Emerging Evidence

Liraglutide appears to improve Incidence of vascular events within 90 days.

ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Incidence of vascular events within 90 days

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 51.7 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.