Acute pancreatitis
Liraglutide → Acute pancreatitis
Liraglutide → Acute pancreatitis
Evidence profile
Key finding
Hazard ratio, 0.56 (95% CI, 0.34-0.91); P = .02
This study investigated the effects of liraglutide on stroke recurrence in patients with type 2 diabetes, finding a lower rate of recurrence compared to the control group.
Evidence strength
Moderate confidence
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
Population
Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes
Intervention
Liraglutide
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Primary outcome
Stroke recurrence
Comparator
Standard treatment
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study investigated the effects of liraglutide on stroke recurrence in patients with type 2 diabetes, finding a lower rate of recurrence compared to the control group.
The findings suggest that liraglutide not only aids in diabetes management but may also play a crucial role in reducing the risk of stroke recurrence. This is significant for clinicians as it highlights the potential of liraglutide to improve patient outcomes in a population at high risk for vascular events.
The study's sample size may limit the generalizability of the findings. The follow-up period of 90 days may not capture long-term outcomes. Potential confounding factors were not fully controlled for in the analysis.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Huili Z, Bin Y, Longyan L, et al. Liraglutide and Stroke Recurrence in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2025;186(1):46-54. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.5684
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
Liraglutide reduced stroke recurrence to 7.9% compared to 13.8% in the control group (p=0.02).
The incidence of ischemic stroke was lower in the liraglutide group at 7.6% versus 13.5% in controls (p=0.02).
A higher proportion of patients achieved a modified Rankin Scale score of ≤ 1 in the liraglutide group (87.3%) compared to controls (77.8%).
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Liraglutide and Acute pancreatitis, All-cause mortality, Gastrointestinal disorders incidence, and 8 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Liraglutide
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
3
Related topics
11
Evidence pairs
85
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Liraglutide → Acute pancreatitis
Liraglutide → Acute pancreatitis
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → All-cause mortality
Liraglutide → All-cause mortality
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Gastrointestinal disorders incidence
Liraglutide → Gastrointestinal disorders incidence
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Hemorrhagic stroke
Liraglutide → Hemorrhagic stroke
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Hypoglycemia events
Liraglutide → Hypoglycemia events
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Incidence of vascular events within 90 days
Liraglutide → Incidence of vascular events within 90 days
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Ischemic stroke
Liraglutide → Ischemic stroke
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 1
Liraglutide → Modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 1
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Pneumonia
Liraglutide → Pneumonia
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Stroke recurrence
Liraglutide → Stroke recurrence
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage
Liraglutide → Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage
Evidence profile
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Ischemic stroke, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 1.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
Contributes to GLP-1 Receptor Agonists evidence base.
All studies measuring Ischemic stroke
Measures Ischemic stroke as a key outcome.
All studies measuring Modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 1
Measures Modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 1 as a key outcome.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists may improve Cardiovascular Outcomes.
ConsensusScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
All-cause mortality
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 34.2 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 9 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Hypoglycemia.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Hypoglycemia events
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 34.2 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 11 supporting studies and existing graph evidence signals.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Gastrointestinal Adverse Events.
ConsensusScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Ranked evidence signals
Gastrointestinal disorders incidence
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 25.4 | moderate negative | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Limitations
Liraglutide appears to improve Incidence of vascular events within 90 days.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Incidence of vascular events within 90 days
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 51.7 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.