AUC during hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL)
Liraglutide → AUC during hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL)
Liraglutide → AUC during hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL)
Evidence profile
Key finding
Significant increase in maximum glucose level during hemodialysis (p=0.026).
This study investigated the effects of hemodialysis on plasma glucose and liraglutide levels in patients with diabetes and end-stage renal disease, finding significant increases in maximum glucose and glycemic variability.
Evidence strength
Moderate confidence
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
Population
Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes
Intervention
Liraglutide
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Primary outcome
Mean glucose
Evidence
Moderate confidence
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study investigated the effects of hemodialysis on plasma glucose and liraglutide levels in patients with diabetes and end-stage renal disease, finding significant increases in maximum glucose and glycemic variability.
Understanding how hemodialysis affects glucose levels is crucial for managing diabetes in patients with end-stage renal disease. The significant increases in maximum glucose and glycemic variability may necessitate adjustments in diabetes treatment protocols to prevent complications.
Non-randomized design may introduce bias. Limited sample size restricts generalizability. Lack of long-term follow-up data.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Takeshi O, Miyoko S, Atsuko T, et al. The effect of hemodialysis on the plasma glucose profile and liraglutide level after liraglutide injection was investigated in patients with diabetes and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12):e113468. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113468
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
Maximum glucose levels increased significantly during hemodialysis (p=0.026, 37.8 mg/dL increase).
Standard deviation of glucose levels increased significantly during hemodialysis (p=0.028, 8.4 mg/dL increase).
Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) increased significantly during hemodialysis (p=0.027, 34.4 mg/dL increase).
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Liraglutide and AUC during hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL), Blood glucose, Duration of hypoglycemia, and 8 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Liraglutide
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
3
Related topics
11
Evidence pairs
161
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Liraglutide → AUC during hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL)
Liraglutide → AUC during hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL)
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Blood glucose
Liraglutide → Blood glucose
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Duration of hypoglycemia
Liraglutide → Duration of hypoglycemia
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Glucose iAUC (OGTT)
Liraglutide → Glucose iAUC (OGTT)
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Injection pain score
Liraglutide → Injection pain score
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Injection-site adverse reactions
Liraglutide → Injection-site adverse reactions
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Maximum glucose
Liraglutide → Maximum glucose
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE)
Liraglutide → Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE)
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Minimum glucose
Liraglutide → Minimum glucose
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Standard deviation of glucose
Liraglutide → Standard deviation of glucose
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Time above 13.9 mmol/L
Liraglutide → Time above 13.9 mmol/L
Evidence profile
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Fasting Glucose.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Blood glucose
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 31.5 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 7 supporting studies and existing graph evidence signals.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Postprandial and OGTT Glucose.
ConsensusScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Glucose iAUC (OGTT)
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 31.5 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 4 supporting studies and existing graph evidence signals.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for CGM Time in Range.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Time above 13.9 mmol/L
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 31.5 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 3 supporting studies and existing graph evidence signals.
Limitations
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists may worsen Glucose Variability or be associated with harm.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE)
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 22.8 | moderate negative | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.