Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

HbA1c mediates cardiovascular benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists

Key finding

Total effect of liraglutide on 3P-MACE was -0.0177.

This study investigated the effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists, liraglutide and semaglutide, on cardiovascular outcomes in diabetes, finding significant reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events.

Evidence strength

Moderate confidence

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Extended (5–20+ y)

High bias
Last updated July 8, 2026

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

Population

Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes

Intervention

Liraglutide, Semaglutide

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Extended (5–20+ y)

Primary outcome

Incidence of nonfatal stroke

Comparator

Placebo, Placebo

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study investigated the effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists, liraglutide and semaglutide, on cardiovascular outcomes in diabetes, finding significant reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events.

Clinical relevance

These findings are crucial as they highlight the cardiovascular benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists for diabetes patients, which can inform treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes. Reducing major cardiovascular events can lead to better overall health and longevity for individuals living with diabetes.

Keep in mind

The effectiveness of the interventions remains unclear due to unspecified p-values. Potential limitations in generalizability due to the specific population studied. Lack of detailed information on long-term outcomes beyond the study duration.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Zi-Yang P, Yu-Hsuan L, Huang-Tz O, Shihchen K. Causal mediation analysis of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular outcomes in diabetes. Cardiovascular Diabetology. 2025;24:465. doi:10.1186/s12933-025-03007-w

Save this study and add notes to your research library.

Main Effects

Liraglutide significantly reduced the incidence of nonfatal stroke and myocardial infarction, as well as cardiovascular death compared to placebo.

HbA1c contributed 38.2% to liraglutide's effect on 3P-MACE.

Semaglutide significantly reduced the incidence of nonfatal stroke and myocardial infarction, as well as cardiovascular death compared to placebo.

HbA1c contributed 51.8% to semaglutide's effect on 3P-MACE.

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Liraglutide, Semaglutide and Cardiovascular death, Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization), Incidence of myocardial infarction, and 1 more.

Primary intervention

Liraglutide

Primary outcomes

  • Cardiovascular death
  • Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)
  • Incidence of myocardial infarction

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

8
Evidence pairs
8
Relationships
3
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 72

3

Related topics

8

Evidence pairs

85

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 8 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 3 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

HarmfulDecrease

Cardiovascular death

Liraglutide → Cardiovascular death

Liraglutide → Cardiovascular death

Evidence profile

HarmfulDecreaseClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details
StrongIncrease

Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)

Liraglutide → Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)

Liraglutide → Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)

Evidence profile

StrongIncreaseClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details
StrongDecrease

Incidence of myocardial infarction

Liraglutide → Incidence of myocardial infarction

Liraglutide → Incidence of myocardial infarction

Evidence profile

StrongDecreaseClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details
HarmfulDecrease

Nonfatal stroke

Liraglutide → Nonfatal stroke

Liraglutide → Nonfatal stroke

Evidence profile

HarmfulDecreaseClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details
HarmfulDecrease

Cardiovascular death

Semaglutide → Cardiovascular death

Semaglutide → Cardiovascular death

Evidence profile

HarmfulDecreaseClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details
StrongIncrease

Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)

Semaglutide → Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)

Semaglutide → Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)

Evidence profile

StrongIncreaseClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details
StrongDecrease

Incidence of myocardial infarction

Semaglutide → Incidence of myocardial infarction

Semaglutide → Incidence of myocardial infarction

Evidence profile

StrongDecreaseClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details
HarmfulDecrease

Nonfatal stroke

Semaglutide → Nonfatal stroke

Semaglutide → Nonfatal stroke

Evidence profile

HarmfulDecreaseClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details

Unlock full evidence analysis

Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • Liraglutide reduced the risk of nonfatal stroke and myocardial infarction, with a cumulative hazard decrease of -0.0177.
  • Semaglutide also significantly reduced the risk of nonfatal stroke and myocardial infarction, with a cumulative hazard decrease of -0.1035.
  • HbA1c levels mediated a significant portion of the cardiovascular benefits for both medications.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Adults with type 2 diabetes.
  • Patients at risk for cardiovascular events.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • The study's findings may not be applicable to all diabetes populations.
  • Further research is needed to confirm long-term benefits and safety.
  • The specific mechanisms by which HbA1c mediates these effects require further exploration.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • The effectiveness of the interventions remains unclear due to unspecified p-values.
  • Potential limitations in generalizability due to the specific population studied.
  • Lack of detailed information on long-term outcomes beyond the study duration.

Unlock Full Analysis

Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.

Already have an account?

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Cardiovascular Outcomes, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Nonfatal stroke.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Archive

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does GLP-1 Receptor Agonists improve cardiovascular outcomes?

Emerging Evidence

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists may improve Cardiovascular Outcomes.

ConsensusScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 57.7 | moderate positive | ConsensusScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 9 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
9 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Liraglutide improve incidence of myocardial infarction?

Emerging Evidence

Liraglutide appears to improve Incidence of myocardial infarction.

ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Incidence of myocardial infarction

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 49.1 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Semaglutide improve incidence of myocardial infarction?

Emerging Evidence

Semaglutide appears to improve Incidence of myocardial infarction.

ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Incidence of myocardial infarction

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 49.1 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Semaglutide improve nonfatal stroke?

Limited Evidence

Semaglutide may worsen Nonfatal stroke or be associated with harm.

ConsensusScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Nonfatal stroke

    EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 39.2 | weak negative | ConsensusScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.