- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Low-GI Diet Improves Glycemic Control in High-Risk Adults
Last updated September 9, 2026
Key finding
Individuals in cluster A had, in general, a lower peak in plasma glucose response.
This study identified differential glycemic responders among adults at elevated risk of Type 2 diabetes through a randomized controlled trial comparing high and low-glycemic index diets.
Quick read
Study at a glance
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
What this paper says
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study identified differential glycemic responders among adults at elevated risk of Type 2 diabetes through a randomized controlled trial comparing high and low-glycemic index diets.
Clinical relevance
Understanding how different diets affect glycemic responses can help tailor dietary recommendations for individuals at risk of Type 2 diabetes, potentially improving their metabolic health and reducing diabetes incidence.
Keep in mind
The effectiveness of the interventions remains unclear due to limited data. The study may not be generalizable to all populations at risk for Type 2 diabetes. Sample size and duration of the study could limit the robustness of the findings.
Published in
Journal Reference
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Viktor S, Therese H, Mikael W, et al. Identification of Differential Glycemic Responders in Adults at Elevated Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients. 2023;15(20):4369. doi:10.3390/nu15204369
Main Effects
Cluster A individuals showed a decrease in plasma glucose response by -0.5 mg/dL (p=0.01).
Cluster A was associated with a decrease in HbA1c by -0.3% (p=0.005).
Cluster A demonstrated an increase in insulin sensitivity by 0.4 units (p=0.002).
Evidence network
How this study fits
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
Evidence Context
This study contributes evidence to High-Glycemic Index Diet, Low glycemic index treatment (LGIT) and Blood glucose, HbA1c, Insulin sensitivity, and 1 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
High-Glycemic Index Diet
Primary outcomes
- Blood glucose
- HbA1c
- Insulin sensitivity
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Evidence relationships
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
Why this study matters
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
4
Related topics
8
Evidence pairs
2072
Related studies
Why it is useful
- Contributes to 8 evidence relationships
- Includes primary outcome data
- Linked to 4 direct semantic evidence topics
Topic contributions
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker
Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Primary evidence
Evidence relationship
Glycemic Control Treatments and HbA1c
Related evidence
Evidence relationship
Glycemic Control Treatments and Fasting Glucose
Save evidence
Evidence relationship
Glycemic Control Treatments and Insulin Resistance
Save evidence
Core evidence
Study findings
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Insulin sensitivity
High-Glycemic Index Diet → Insulin sensitivity
High-Glycemic Index Diet → Insulin sensitivity
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Plasma Glucose Response Cluster B
High-Glycemic Index Diet → Plasma Glucose Response Cluster B
High-Glycemic Index Diet → Plasma Glucose Response Cluster B
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Blood glucose
Low glycemic index treatment (LGIT) → Blood glucose
Low glycemic index treatment (LGIT) → Blood glucose
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
- EvidenceScore™
- Strong
- Score 79 · Based on 3 studies
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 100
- consistent
Insulin sensitivity
Low glycemic index treatment (LGIT) → Insulin sensitivity
Low glycemic index treatment (LGIT) → Insulin sensitivity
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Plasma Glucose Response Cluster B
Low glycemic index treatment (LGIT) → Plasma Glucose Response Cluster B
Low glycemic index treatment (LGIT) → Plasma Glucose Response Cluster B
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Suggest
- Low-glycemic index diet led to a significant decrease in HbA1c by -0.3% (p=0.005).
- Plasma glucose response decreased by -0.5 mg/dL in Cluster A (p=0.01).
- Insulin sensitivity increased by 0.4 units in Cluster A (p=0.002).
Who this applies to
- Adults at elevated risk for Type 2 diabetes.
- Individuals with varying responses to dietary glycemic index.
Keep in Mind
- Results may not apply to individuals without elevated diabetes risk.
- Further research is needed to confirm findings across diverse populations.
- The study's short duration may not capture long-term dietary effects.
Between the Lines
- The effectiveness of the interventions remains unclear due to limited data.
- The study may not be generalizable to all populations at risk for Type 2 diabetes.
- Sample size and duration of the study could limit the robustness of the findings.
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Connected Evidence
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Glycemic Control Treatments and HbA1c, High-Glycemic Index Diet and Fasting Glucose.
Related evidence relationships
Explore in Evidence ExplorerThis study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Glycemic Control Treatments → HbA1c
Diet and Nutrition
- EvidenceScore™
- Strong
- Score 79 · Based on 3 studies
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 100
- consistent
High-Glycemic Index Diet → Fasting Glucose
Behavioral & Lifestyle
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Included in these evidence collections
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
Glycemic Control Treatments Evidence Hub
All studies on Glycemic Control Treatments
Contributes to Glycemic Control Treatments evidence base.
HbA1c Evidence Hub
All studies measuring HbA1c
Measures HbA1c as a key outcome.
Fasting Glucose Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Fasting Glucose
Measures Fasting Glucose as a key outcome.
High-Glycemic Index Diet Evidence Hub
All studies on High-Glycemic Index Diet
Contributes to High-Glycemic Index Diet evidence base.
Explore more in Evidence Explorer
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
All studies on Low glycemic index treatment (LGIT) and HbA1c
3 results
All studies on High-Glycemic Index Diet and Blood glucose
1 results
All studies on Low glycemic index treatment (LGIT)
3 results
All studies on High-Glycemic Index Diet
1 results
All studies measuring HbA1c
3 results
Questions answered by this study
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Does Glycemic Control Treatments lower HbA1c?
Glycemic Control Treatments appears to lower HbA1c.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 79.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 4 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Does Glycemic Control Treatments improve fasting glucose?
Glycemic Control Treatments appears to improve fasting glucose.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Blood glucose
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
Does Glycemic Control Treatments improve insulin resistance?
Glycemic Control Treatments appears to improve insulin resistance.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Insulin sensitivity
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
Does High-Glycemic Index Diet improve blood glucose?
High-Glycemic Index Diet appears to improve blood glucose.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Blood glucose
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
Next steps
Continue your research
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Evidence topics
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Explore in Evidence Explorer
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Related research
Read related research summaries.
No ads. No tracking.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.
