Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Music Therapy Improves Cognition and Quality of Life in Diabetic Elderly

Last updated July 18, 2026

Key finding

MoCA scores improved from 22.5 ± 2.0 to 26.1 ± 1.8.

This study evaluated the impact of receptive music therapy combined with usual nursing care on cognitive performance and quality of life in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Short-Term (≤3 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study evaluated the impact of receptive music therapy combined with usual nursing care on cognitive performance and quality of life in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes.

Clinical relevance

These findings suggest that integrating receptive music therapy into the care of elderly patients with type 2 diabetes may enhance their cognitive abilities and overall well-being. As cognitive decline and quality of life are crucial concerns in this population, such interventions could provide a valuable addition to standard nursing care, potentially leading to better health outcomes.

Keep in mind

Unclear effectiveness for some outcomes. Limited generalizability due to specific population. Potential confounding factors not controlled.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Ran S, Qi S, Jingwei L, Shuo C, Yuting F, Xianhong Z. Receptive Music Therapy Combined with Usual Nursing Care Improves Cognitive Performance and Quality of Life in Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Frontiers in Neurology. 2026;17:1735619. doi:10.3389/fneur.2026.1735619

Main Effects

MoCA scores improved by 3.6 points (p = 0.003).

WHOQOL-BREF scores increased by 8.9 points (p = 0.005).

GDS-15 scores decreased by 2.8 points (p = 0.002).

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Usual care and Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score, Depression score, Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG), and 2 more.

Primary intervention

Usual care

Primary outcomes

  • Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score
  • Depression score
  • Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

5
Evidence pairs
5
Relationships
2
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 68

2

Related topics

5

Evidence pairs

555

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 5 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 2 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker

Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Primary evidence

Evidence topic

Glycemic Control

matched_outcome

Related evidence

Evidence topic

HbA1c Reduction

Save evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score

Usual care → Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score

Usual care → Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Depression score

Usual care → Depression score

Usual care → Depression score

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Usual care → Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Usual care → Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Strong
Score 79 · Based on 4 studies
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
100
consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 4 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

HbA1c

Usual care → HbA1c

Usual care → HbA1c

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
86
Strong
ImpactScore™
56
Slightly Positive
ConsistencyScore™
89
consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 9 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Quality of life

Usual care → Quality of life

Usual care → Quality of life

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
ImpactScore™
75
Positive
ConsistencyScore™
35
mixed
Supporting studies: Based on 2 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • MoCA scores improved significantly by 3.6 points.
  • WHOQOL-BREF scores increased by 8.9 points.
  • GDS-15 scores showed a significant decrease of 2.8 points.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Elderly patients aged 65 and older.
  • Individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • Results may not apply to younger populations.
  • Study focused on a specific intervention type.
  • Further research needed to confirm findings.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • Unclear effectiveness for some outcomes.
  • Limited generalizability due to specific population.
  • Potential confounding factors not controlled.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Usual care and HbA1c, Usual care and Fasting Glucose.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Usual care improve HbA1c?

Strong Evidence

Usual care may improve HbA1c.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    HbA1c

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 85.7 | weak positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Usual care improve fasting plasma glucose (fpg)?

Strong Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Usual care for Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG).

ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 79.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Usual care improve quality of life?

Moderate Evidence

Usual care may improve Quality of life.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.

Evidence caveat: The available evidence reports mixed findings.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Quality of life

    EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.0 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Mixed | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Usual care improve change in montreal cognitive assessment (moca) score?

Emerging Evidence

Usual care appears to improve Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.