All-cause mortality
Semaglutide → All-cause mortality
Semaglutide → All-cause mortality
Evidence profile
Key finding
Semaglutide significantly reduced the risk of primary MACE (HR [95% CI] 0.76 [0.62; 0.92], p = 0.0062).
This study evaluated the cardiorenal effects of semaglutide in individuals with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk, finding significant reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events.
Evidence strength
Moderate confidence
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
Population
Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes
Intervention
Semaglutide
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Primary outcome
Time to primary major adverse MACE
Comparator
Placebo
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated the cardiorenal effects of semaglutide in individuals with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk, finding significant reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events.
These findings are important as they suggest that semaglutide may be an effective treatment option for reducing cardiovascular risks in patients with type 2 diabetes, a population that is often at elevated risk for heart complications. This could lead to improved management strategies for these patients, potentially reducing the burden of cardiovascular disease.
The study did not show significant effects on cardiovascular death or all-cause mortality. The generalizability of findings may be limited to the specific population studied. Potential confounding factors were not fully explored.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Jingmin Z, Mansoor H, Yang L, et al. Cardiorenal effects of semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk. Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism. 2025;27(10):5706-5715. doi:10.1111/dom.16621
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
Semaglutide significantly reduced the risk of primary MACE (HR 0.76, p = 0.0062).
Semaglutide significantly reduced the risk of expanded MACE (HR 0.80, p = 0.0097).
Semaglutide consistently reduced nephropathy risk (HR 0.64, p = 0.0054).
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Semaglutide and All-cause mortality, Cardiovascular death, Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization), and 1 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Semaglutide
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
2
Related topics
4
Evidence pairs
75
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Semaglutide → All-cause mortality
Semaglutide → All-cause mortality
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Cardiovascular death
Semaglutide → Cardiovascular death
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)
Semaglutide → Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Nephropathy progression
Semaglutide → Nephropathy progression
Evidence profile
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Cardiovascular Outcomes, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Cardiovascular Outcomes.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring Cardiovascular Outcomes
Measures Cardiovascular Outcomes as a key outcome.
All studies on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
Contributes to GLP-1 Receptor Agonists evidence base.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
5 results
6 results
5 results
5 results
6 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists may improve Cardiovascular Outcomes.
ConsensusScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 57.7 | moderate positive | ConsensusScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study
All-cause mortality
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 54.4 | weak positive | ConsensusScore™ Mixed | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 9 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Kidney Function.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Nephropathy progression
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 49.1 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 5 supporting studies and existing graph evidence signals.
Limitations
Semaglutide may worsen Cardiovascular death or be associated with harm.
ConsensusScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Ranked evidence signals
Cardiovascular death
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 31.4 | weak negative | ConsensusScore™ Mixed | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.