All-cause mortality
Semaglutide → All-cause mortality
Semaglutide → All-cause mortality
Evidence profile
Key finding
Semaglutide reduced CV death/MI/stroke by 18% [hazard ratio (HR) 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.68–0.98); P = .03]
The FLOW trial investigated the effects of semaglutide on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease, revealing significant reductions in cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke.
Evidence strength
Moderate confidence
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
Population
Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes
Intervention
Semaglutide, Placebo
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Primary outcome
Composite of CV death
Comparator
Placebo
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
The FLOW trial investigated the effects of semaglutide on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease, revealing significant reductions in cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke.
The findings from the FLOW trial are clinically significant as they highlight the potential of semaglutide to improve cardiovascular outcomes in a vulnerable population. Patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease are at increased risk for cardiovascular events, and effective interventions like semaglutide could lead to better health outcomes and reduced mortality rates in this group.
The study's effectiveness data were unclear for some outcomes. Results may not be generalizable to populations outside the trial. Potential unmeasured confounders may affect the outcomes. The trial design may limit long-term outcome assessments.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Kenneth WM, Katherine RT, Mustafa A, et al. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: Results from the FLOW Trial. European Heart Journal. 2025;46(12):1096-1108. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae613
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
Semaglutide reduced the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke by 18% (HR 0.82, p = 0.03).
All-cause mortality was reduced by 20% with semaglutide (HR 0.80, p = 0.01).
No significant difference was observed in the composite outcome between groups (p = 0.03).
No significant difference was found in all-cause mortality between groups (p = 0.01).
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Semaglutide and All-cause mortality, Composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Semaglutide
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
2
Related topics
2
Evidence pairs
75
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Semaglutide → All-cause mortality
Semaglutide → All-cause mortality
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke
Semaglutide → Composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke
Evidence profile
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Cardiovascular Outcomes, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring Cardiovascular Outcomes
Measures Cardiovascular Outcomes as a key outcome.
All studies on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
Contributes to GLP-1 Receptor Agonists evidence base.
All studies measuring Composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke
Measures Composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke as a key outcome.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
6 results
2 results
6 results
6 results
2 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists may improve Cardiovascular Outcomes.
ConsensusScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
All-cause mortality
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 54.4 | weak positive | ConsensusScore™ Mixed | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 9 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
Semaglutide may improve Composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke.
ConsensusScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Ranked evidence signals
Composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 47.8 | moderate positive | ConsensusScore™ Mixed | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.