Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Telehealth Program Improves Wound Healing in Diabetic CABG Patients

Last updated August 29, 2026

Key finding

The intervention group had significantly lower mean scores for SVG donor site wound healing level than the control group on days 14-21 after surgery (p = 0.012, mean = 0.58 ± 0.54 and 1.08 ± 0.82, respectively).

This study evaluated a telehealth program aimed at promoting wound healing in diabetic patients undergoing CABG, finding improved SVG donor site healing.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Short-Term (≤3 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study evaluated a telehealth program aimed at promoting wound healing in diabetic patients undergoing CABG, finding improved SVG donor site healing.

Clinical relevance

Improving wound healing in diabetic patients after CABG is crucial, as these patients are at higher risk for complications. The findings suggest that telehealth interventions can be effective in enhancing recovery outcomes, potentially leading to reduced healthcare costs and improved patient quality of life.

Keep in mind

The study may have limited generalizability due to a specific population focus. The effectiveness of the telehealth program remains unclear for sternal wound healing. Sample size and duration of follow-up may limit the robustness of the findings.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Siriporn S, Usavadee A, Kessiri W, Kriangkrai T. The Effects of a Telehealth Program for Wound Healing Promotion in Patients with Diabetes Undergoing CABG. Belitung Nursing Journal. 2023;9(5):428-436. doi:10.33546/bnj.2775

Main Effects

The intervention group had significantly lower mean scores for SVG donor site wound healing (mean = 0.58 ± 0.54) compared to the control group (mean = 1.08 ± 0.82, p = 0.012).

No significant difference was found in sternal wound healing levels between groups (p = 0.126), although the intervention group had lower mean scores.

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Telehealth program for wound healing promotion (TPWHP) and SVG Donor Site Wound Healing Level, Wound healing rate measured by reduction in ulcer size.

Primary intervention

Telehealth program for wound healing promotion (TPWHP)

Primary outcomes

  • SVG Donor Site Wound Healing Level
  • Wound healing rate measured by reduction in ulcer size

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

2
Evidence pairs
2
Relationships
0
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Limited contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 42

0

Related topics

2

Evidence pairs

0

Related studies

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 2 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 0 direct semantic evidence topics

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

SVG Donor Site Wound Healing Level

Telehealth program for wound healing promotion (TPWHP) → SVG Donor Site Wound Healing Level

Telehealth program for wound healing promotion (TPWHP) → SVG Donor Site Wound Healing Level

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Wound healing rate measured by reduction in ulcer size

Telehealth program for wound healing promotion (TPWHP) → Wound healing rate measured by reduction in ulcer size

Telehealth program for wound healing promotion (TPWHP) → Wound healing rate measured by reduction in ulcer size

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • SVG donor site healing improved significantly with the telehealth program (p = 0.012).
  • No significant change was observed in sternal wound healing levels (p = 0.126).
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Diabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
  • Patients at risk for poor wound healing post-surgery.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • Results may not be applicable to non-diabetic patients or other surgical procedures.
  • Further research is needed to confirm long-term benefits of telehealth interventions.
  • The study did not assess all potential confounding factors affecting wound healing.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • The study may have limited generalizability due to a specific population focus.
  • The effectiveness of the telehealth program remains unclear for sternal wound healing.
  • Sample size and duration of follow-up may limit the robustness of the findings.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Telehealth program for wound healing promotion (TPWHP) and SVG Donor Site Wound Healing Level, Telehealth program for wound healing promotion (TPWHP) and Wound healing rate measured by reduction in ulcer size.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Explore more in Evidence Explorer

Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Telehealth program for wound healing promotion (TPWHP) improve svg donor site wound healing level?

Emerging Evidence

Telehealth program for wound healing promotion (TPWHP) appears to improve svg donor site wound healing level.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    SVG Donor Site Wound Healing Level

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

What evidence is available on Telehealth program for wound healing promotion (TPWHP) and wound healing rate measured by reduction in ulcer size?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear reduction in wound healing rate measured by reduction in ulcer size with Telehealth program for wound healing promotion (TPWHP).

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Wound healing rate measured by reduction in ulcer size

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.