Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

WWDP+ improves wellness outcomes for midlife women with type 2 diabetes

Last updated July 11, 2026

Key finding

Diabetes distress decreased by 1.52 points (p < 0.001).

The Women’s Wellness with Type 2 Diabetes Programme (WWDP+) was found to be acceptable and feasible for midlife women, demonstrating significant improvements in various health outcomes.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Medium-Term (3–12 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Keep this study in your Evidence Tracker so you can easily find it again whenever you need it.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.

Study focus

The Women’s Wellness with Type 2 Diabetes Programme (WWDP+) was found to be acceptable and feasible for midlife women, demonstrating significant improvements in various health outcomes.

Clinical relevance

These findings are significant as they suggest that structured behavioral-lifestyle interventions like WWDP+ can enhance the quality of life for midlife women with type 2 diabetes. By addressing both diabetes management and menopausal symptoms, the program could lead to better overall health outcomes and empower women to take control of their health.

Keep in mind

Non-randomized design limits causal inference Sample size and demographics may affect generalizability Self-reported measures could introduce bias

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Deniz B, Maria D, Iliatha PN, Rosie W, Jackie S, Aqeel MA. The Women’s Wellness with Type 2 Diabetes Programme (WWDP+) is Acceptable and Feasible for Midlife Women. PLOS One. 2026;21(3):e0345517. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0345517

Main Effects

Diabetes distress decreased by 1.52 points (p < 0.001)

Self-reported HbA1c decreased by 13 mmol/mol (p < 0.02)

Menopausal symptoms declined by 13 points on the Greene scale (p < 0.001)

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Intensive lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes remission and BMI, Diabetes Distress Scale score, Diabetes management self-efficacy, and 5 more.

Primary intervention

Intensive lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes remission

Primary outcomes

  • BMI
  • Diabetes Distress Scale score
  • Diabetes management self-efficacy

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

8
Evidence pairs
8
Relationships
3
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 72

3

Related topics

8

Evidence pairs

345

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 8 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 3 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker

Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Primary evidence

Evidence relationship

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and HbA1c

Related evidence

Evidence relationship

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Quality of Life Outcomes

Follow evidence

Evidence relationship

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Body Mass Index

Follow evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

BMI

Intensive lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes remission → BMI

Intensive lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes remission → BMI

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
84
Positive
EvidenceScore™
70
Moderate
ConsistencyScore™
100
consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 3 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Diabetes Distress Scale score

Intensive lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes remission → Diabetes Distress Scale score

Intensive lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes remission → Diabetes Distress Scale score

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Diabetes management self-efficacy

Intensive lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes remission → Diabetes management self-efficacy

Intensive lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes remission → Diabetes management self-efficacy

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

General Health Management Improvement

Intensive lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes remission → General Health Management Improvement

Intensive lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes remission → General Health Management Improvement

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

HbA1c

Intensive lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes remission → HbA1c

Intensive lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes remission → HbA1c

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
64
Slightly Positive
EvidenceScore™
73
Moderate
ConsistencyScore™
75
consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 4 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Increased confidence in making dietary choices

Intensive lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes remission → Increased confidence in making dietary choices

Intensive lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes remission → Increased confidence in making dietary choices

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Menopausal symptoms decline

Intensive lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes remission → Menopausal symptoms decline

Intensive lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes remission → Menopausal symptoms decline

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Sleep quality

Intensive lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes remission → Sleep quality

Intensive lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes remission → Sleep quality

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Build your personal Evidence Workspace

Create a free account to save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Today's Activity

Your Evidence Workspace

Free account

Saved this study

Your free account becomes your personal diabetes evidence workspace.

Evidence Tracker

12 tracked topics

Saved Studies

48 studies

Research Notes

Coming Soon

Weekly Evidence Digest

Coming Soon

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • Diabetes distress decreased significantly by 1.52 points.
  • Self-reported HbA1c levels dropped by 13 mmol/mol.
  • Menopausal symptoms reduced by 13 points on the Greene scale.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Midlife women aged 45-65
  • Women diagnosed with type 2 diabetes
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • Results may not apply to younger women or those without diabetes.
  • Findings are based on self-reported data, which may not be fully accurate.
  • The non-randomized design limits the ability to establish causality.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • Non-randomized design limits causal inference
  • Sample size and demographics may affect generalizability
  • Self-reported measures could introduce bias

Save this study

Keep this study in your Evidence Tracker so you can easily find it again whenever you need it.

Today's Activity

Your Evidence Workspace

Free account

Saved this study

Your free account becomes your personal diabetes evidence workspace.

Evidence Tracker

12 tracked topics

Saved Studies

48 studies

Research Notes

Coming Soon

Weekly Evidence Digest

Coming Soon

Already have an account?

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and HbA1c, Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Body Mass Index.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Archive

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Included in these evidence collections

Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve HbA1c?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve HbA1c.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    HbA1c

    EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 73.2 | weak positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 28 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
28 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve quality of life outcomes?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs appears to improve Quality of Life Outcomes.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Sleep quality

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 10 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
10 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs affect body mass index?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Body Mass Index.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.

Evidence caveat: The available evidence reports mixed findings.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    BMI

    EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.7 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
11 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve diabetes management self-efficacy?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs appears to improve Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Diabetes management self-efficacy

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 9 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
9 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.