Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Digital-Driven Model Improves Diabetes Management in Underresourced Areas

Last updated June 19, 2026

Key finding

HbA1c decreased by 2.57% in the intervention group compared to 1.96% in the control group (P <.001; 95% CI –1.027 to –0.238).

This study evaluated a digital-driven physician-pharmacist collaborative model for managing Type 2 diabetes in underresourced settings, finding significant improvements in several health outcomes.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Long-Term (1–5 y)

Risk of bias

High Risk

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study evaluated a digital-driven physician-pharmacist collaborative model for managing Type 2 diabetes in underresourced settings, finding significant improvements in several health outcomes.

Clinical relevance

This study highlights the potential of integrating digital health solutions with collaborative care models to enhance diabetes management, particularly in underresourced areas. Improved outcomes in HbA1c, cardiovascular risk, and patient satisfaction suggest that such interventions could lead to better health and quality of life for patients with Type 2 diabetes, ultimately reducing healthcare costs and burden on healthcare systems.

Keep in mind

The study was limited to underresourced settings, which may affect generalizability. The sample size and demographic characteristics may not represent the broader population of diabetes patients. Long-term sustainability of the intervention's effects was not assessed.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Jie X, Qing W, Shenglan T, et al. Long-term Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of a Digital-Driven Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Model for Managing Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Underresourced Settings: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2026;28. doi:10.2196/77470

Main Effects

HbA1c decreased by 2.57% in the intervention group compared to 1.96% in the control group (P <.001).

10-year ASCVD risk decreased by 1.35 in the intervention group compared to an increase of 0.01 in the control group (P <.001).

Patient satisfaction improved significantly in the intervention group (P <.001).

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care and 10-year ASCVD risk, 2-hour plasma glucose, BMI, and 10 more.

Primary intervention

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care

Primary outcomes

  • 10-year ASCVD risk
  • 2-hour plasma glucose
  • BMI

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

13
Evidence pairs
13
Relationships
6
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 72

6

Related topics

13

Evidence pairs

706

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 13 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 6 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker

Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Primary evidence

Evidence relationship

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Fasting Glucose

Related evidence

Evidence relationship

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and HbA1c

Save evidence

Evidence relationship

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Body Mass Index

Save evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

10-year ASCVD risk

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → 10-year ASCVD risk

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → 10-year ASCVD risk

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

2-hour plasma glucose

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → 2-hour plasma glucose

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → 2-hour plasma glucose

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

BMI

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → BMI

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → BMI

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

HbA1c

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → HbA1c

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → HbA1c

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
ImpactScore™
75
Positive
ConsistencyScore™
35
mixed
Supporting studies: Based on 2 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

HDL cholesterol

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → HDL cholesterol

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → HDL cholesterol

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

LDL cholesterol

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → LDL cholesterol

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → LDL cholesterol

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Systolic blood pressure

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → Systolic blood pressure

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → Systolic blood pressure

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Total cholesterol

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → Total cholesterol

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → Total cholesterol

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Treatment satisfaction

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → Treatment satisfaction

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → Treatment satisfaction

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Triglycerides

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → Triglycerides

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → Triglycerides

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Waist circumference

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → Waist circumference

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → Waist circumference

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Waist-to-hip ratio

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → Waist-to-hip ratio

Digital physician-pharmacist collaborative care → Waist-to-hip ratio

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • HbA1c levels significantly decreased by 2.57% in the intervention group.
  • 10-year ASCVD risk decreased by 1.35 in the intervention group.
  • Patient satisfaction improved significantly with the intervention.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Adults diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes.
  • Patients receiving care in underresourced healthcare settings.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • Results may not be applicable to well-resourced healthcare settings.
  • The intervention's effectiveness over a longer period remains uncertain.
  • Further studies are needed to explore the model's applicability across diverse populations.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • The study was limited to underresourced settings, which may affect generalizability.
  • The sample size and demographic characteristics may not represent the broader population of diabetes patients.
  • Long-term sustainability of the intervention's effects was not assessed.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and HbA1c, Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Cardiovascular Outcomes.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Included in these evidence collections

Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve fasting glucose?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Fasting Glucose.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 8 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
8 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve HbA1c?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve HbA1c.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    HbA1c

    EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.0 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Mixed | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 30 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
30 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs affect body mass index?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Body Mass Index.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.

Evidence caveat: The available evidence reports mixed findings.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    BMI

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
11 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve body composition?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs appears to improve Body Composition.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Waist circumference

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

  2. 2

    Waist-to-hip ratio

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 6 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
6 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.