- EvidenceScore™
- 55
- Emerging
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Empagliflozin reduces mortality in real-world type 2 diabetes patients, including those excluded from pivotal trials
Last updated May 4, 2026
Key finding
A trial emulation using UK primary care data from 62,503 people with type 2 diabetes found that empagliflozin reduced the risk of death by 24% compared with DPP-4 inhibitors, with consistent benefits in patients who would have been excluded from the original EMPA-REG trial.
Researchers used UK electronic health records to estimate how well empagliflozin works in real-world patients with type 2 diabetes, including the 83% who would not have qualified for the original EMPA-REG trial. Over up to 9.6 years of follow-up, empagliflozin reduced the risk of death by 24% compared with an older drug class, with consistent benefits across all patient groups.
Quick read
Study at a glance
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
Cohort
Follow-up
Long-Term (> 12 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
What this paper says
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
A trial emulation using UK primary care data from 62,503 people with type 2 diabetes found that empagliflozin reduced the risk of death by 24% compared with DPP-4 inhibitors, with consistent benefits in patients who would have been excluded from the original EMPA-REG trial.
Published in
Journal Reference
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Ryan DK, Keogh RH, Williamson E, et al. Enhancing evidence-based care using trial emulation in electronic health records: real-world effects of empagliflozin in people with type 2 diabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2026;14(1):e005672. doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2025-005672
Main Effects
All-cause mortality ↓ by 24% with empagliflozin vs DPP-4 inhibitors (aHR 0.76)
Consistent benefit in RCT-ineligible patients (83% of real-world users)
NNT of 47 to prevent one death over 3 years
Evidence network
How this study fits
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
Evidence Context
This study contributes evidence to Empagliflozin and All-cause mortality.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Empagliflozin
Primary outcomes
- All-cause mortality
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Evidence relationships
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
Why this study matters
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
2
Related topics
1
Evidence pairs
61
Related studies
Why it is useful
- Contributes to 1 evidence relationship
- Linked to 2 direct semantic evidence topics
Topic contributions
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker
Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Primary evidence
Evidence relationship
SGLT2 Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Outcomes
Related evidence
Evidence topic
Cardiovascular Risk
Save evidence
Evidence topic
SGLT2 Inhibitors
Save evidence
Core evidence
Study findings
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Suggest
- Empagliflozin was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality compared with DPP-4 inhibitors across the full study population (adjusted HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.83).
- The mortality benefit was consistent regardless of whether patients met EMPA-REG RCT eligibility criteria (p-interaction=0.27), supporting broader real-world use.
- Sensitivity analyses using IPTW and E-values confirmed the robustness of findings against potential unmeasured confounding.
Who this applies to
These findings apply to adults with type 2 diabetes who are candidates for SGLT2 inhibitor therapy, including those without established cardiovascular disease. The results are most relevant to patients managed in primary care settings similar to the UK healthcare system, given the use of THIN database data from 2014 to 2022.
Keep in Mind
This was not a randomized trial - it used statistical methods to try to replicate what an RCT would find. The active comparator design (DPP-4 inhibitors vs placebo) helps reduce bias, but unmeasured factors like frailty could still affect results. The study did not examine safety outcomes or other SGLT2 inhibitors besides empagliflozin.
Between the Lines
- Observational design means residual confounding is possible despite rigorous methods.
- Cause-specific mortality data were not available, so only all-cause mortality could be assessed.
- The study used UK primary care data, so results may not apply to all healthcare settings.
- Safety outcomes were not assessed in this analysis.
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Connected Evidence
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on SGLT2 Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Outcomes.
Related evidence relationships
Explore in Evidence ExplorerThis study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
SGLT2 Inhibitors → Cardiovascular Outcomes
Medications
- EvidenceScore™
- 55
- Emerging
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Included in these evidence collections
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
Explore more in Evidence Explorer
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
Questions answered by this study
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Does SGLT2 Inhibitors improve cardiovascular outcomes?
SGLT2 Inhibitors may improve Cardiovascular Outcomes.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
All-cause mortality
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 54.5 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 5 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
- Population details are unavailable.
Next steps
Continue your research
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Evidence topics
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Explore in Evidence Explorer
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Related research
Read related research summaries.
No ads. No tracking.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.
