Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Afternoon fed resistance exercise improves glucose levels in type 1 diabetes

Last updated July 12, 2026

Key finding

Mean glucose levels were lower in the 6-hour period after afternoon fed versus morning fasted resistance exercise (9.46 ± 2.56 vs. 8.65 ± 2.04 mmol/L, P = 0.04).

This study examined how resistance exercise timing and feeding status affect glycaemic responses in individuals with type 1 diabetes, finding significant differences in glucose levels post-exercise.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Short-Term (≤3 mo)

Risk of bias

High Risk

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study examined how resistance exercise timing and feeding status affect glycaemic responses in individuals with type 1 diabetes, finding significant differences in glucose levels post-exercise.

Clinical relevance

These findings are significant for individuals with type 1 diabetes as they highlight the importance of exercise timing and feeding status in managing blood glucose levels. By optimizing exercise routines, patients may achieve better glycaemic control, potentially reducing the risk of diabetes-related complications.

Keep in mind

Limited sample size may affect generalizability. Short duration of follow-up may not capture long-term effects. Participants were only individuals with type 1 diabetes, limiting applicability to other diabetes types.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Ebaa SAO, Yasmine GH, Ameenah AAA, et al. Resistance exercise timing and feeding status influence glycaemic responses in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews. 2026;42(5):e70190. doi:10.1002/dmrr.70190

Main Effects

Mean glucose levels were significantly lower after afternoon fed resistance exercise compared to morning fasted exercise (-0.81 mmol/L, P = 0.04).

Mean glucose levels were significantly lower after afternoon fed resistance exercise compared to morning fed exercise (-0.57 mmol/L, P = 0.04).

No significant difference in time in range was observed between morning fasted and afternoon fed resistance exercise (50.9% vs. 67.0%, P = 0.007).

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Resistance training and Blood glucose, Time above range, Time in range.

Primary intervention

Resistance training

Primary outcomes

  • Blood glucose
  • Time above range
  • Time in range

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

3
Evidence pairs
3
Relationships
1
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 63

1

Related topics

3

Evidence pairs

171

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 3 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 1 direct semantic evidence topic

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker

Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Primary evidence

Evidence topic

Glycemic Control

matched_outcome

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Blood glucose

Resistance training → Blood glucose

Resistance training → Blood glucose

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Time above range

Resistance training → Time above range

Resistance training → Time above range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Time in range

Resistance training → Time in range

Resistance training → Time in range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • Afternoon fed resistance exercise reduced mean glucose levels by 0.81 mmol/L compared to morning fasted exercise.
  • No significant difference in time in range was found between morning fasted and afternoon fed exercises.
  • Participants spent more time above range after morning fed exercise compared to afternoon fed.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Individuals diagnosed with type 1 diabetes.
  • Patients managing diabetes through exercise and diet.
  • Adults aged 18-65 engaging in resistance training.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • Results may not apply to individuals with type 2 diabetes.
  • Findings are based on a specific exercise regimen and may not generalize to other forms of physical activity.
  • Further research is needed to explore long-term effects and mechanisms.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • Limited sample size may affect generalizability.
  • Short duration of follow-up may not capture long-term effects.
  • Participants were only individuals with type 1 diabetes, limiting applicability to other diabetes types.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Resistance training and Fasting Glucose, Resistance training and CGM Time in Range.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Resistance training improve blood glucose?

Emerging Evidence

Resistance training appears to improve Blood glucose.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Blood glucose

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Resistance training improve time above range?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Resistance training for Time above range.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Time above range

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Resistance training improve time in range?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Resistance training for Time in range.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Time in range

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.