Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Diabetes-specific formula improves recovery in non-diabetic stroke patients

Last updated August 22, 2026

Key finding

In CG, there were more cases of hyperglycaemia on the 5th day post-NE (13(65%) vs 7(35%), p < 0.01).

This study evaluated the impact of a diabetes-specific enteral formula on non-diabetic stroke patients, finding reduced hyperglycaemia and improved oral recovery rates.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Short-Term (≤3 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study evaluated the impact of a diabetes-specific enteral formula on non-diabetic stroke patients, finding reduced hyperglycaemia and improved oral recovery rates.

Clinical relevance

Managing blood sugar levels is crucial for stroke recovery, as hyperglycaemia can worsen outcomes. This study suggests that using a diabetes-specific enteral formula in non-diabetic stroke patients may help mitigate these risks and enhance recovery, potentially influencing dietary practices in clinical settings.

Keep in mind

The study's sample size may limit the generalizability of the findings. The trial only included non-diabetic patients, which may not apply to diabetic populations. Effectiveness measures were deemed unclear, limiting definitive conclusions.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Juan JL, Esther DG, David P, et al. The use of a diabetes-specific enteral formula in non-diabetic patients admitted with acute stroke reduced the risk of developing hyperglycaemia and improved the rate of oral route recovery. Nutrition & Diabetes. 2024;14:34. doi:10.1038/s41387-024-00292-4

Main Effects

The diabetes-specific formula group had 6 more cases of hyperglycaemia compared to the control group (p < 0.01).

Oral route recovery was significantly better in the diabetes-specific formula group with 6 more patients recovering (p = 0.04).

No significant differences were found in length of stay between groups (p = 0.19).

Mortality rates were similar between groups (p = 0.8).

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Diabetes-specific nutritional formula-pro (DSNF-Pro) and Incidence of hyperglycaemia during enteral nutrition treatment, Length of stay in intensive care, Mortality rate at 30 days post-intervention, and 1 more.

Primary intervention

Diabetes-specific nutritional formula-pro (DSNF-Pro)

Primary outcomes

  • Incidence of hyperglycaemia during enteral nutrition treatment
  • Length of stay in intensive care
  • Mortality rate at 30 days post-intervention

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

4
Evidence pairs
4
Relationships
0
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 50

0

Related topics

4

Evidence pairs

0

Related studies

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 4 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 0 direct semantic evidence topics

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Incidence of hyperglycaemia during enteral nutrition treatment

Diabetes-specific nutritional formula-pro (DSNF-Pro) → Incidence of hyperglycaemia during enteral nutrition treatment

Diabetes-specific nutritional formula-pro (DSNF-Pro) → Incidence of hyperglycaemia during enteral nutrition treatment

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
25
Negative
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Length of stay in intensive care

Diabetes-specific nutritional formula-pro (DSNF-Pro) → Length of stay in intensive care

Diabetes-specific nutritional formula-pro (DSNF-Pro) → Length of stay in intensive care

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Mortality rate at 30 days post-intervention

Diabetes-specific nutritional formula-pro (DSNF-Pro) → Mortality rate at 30 days post-intervention

Diabetes-specific nutritional formula-pro (DSNF-Pro) → Mortality rate at 30 days post-intervention

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Rate of oral route recovery

Diabetes-specific nutritional formula-pro (DSNF-Pro) → Rate of oral route recovery

Diabetes-specific nutritional formula-pro (DSNF-Pro) → Rate of oral route recovery

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • Diabetes-specific formula reduced hyperglycaemia by 6 cases (p < 0.01).
  • Oral recovery improved by 6 patients in the diabetes-specific group (p = 0.04).
  • No significant difference in length of stay or mortality rates.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Non-diabetic patients admitted with acute stroke.
  • Patients requiring enteral nutrition during stroke recovery.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • The findings may not be applicable to diabetic patients.
  • Results are based on a specific population and may not generalize to all stroke patients.
  • Further research is needed to confirm long-term effects and safety.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • The study's sample size may limit the generalizability of the findings.
  • The trial only included non-diabetic patients, which may not apply to diabetic populations.
  • Effectiveness measures were deemed unclear, limiting definitive conclusions.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Diabetes-specific nutritional formula-pro (DSNF-Pro) and Incidence of hyperglycaemia during enteral nutrition treatment, Diabetes-specific nutritional formula-pro (DSNF-Pro) and Length of stay in intensive care.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Included in these evidence collections

Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.

Explore more in Evidence Explorer

Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Diabetes-specific nutritional formula-pro (DSNF-Pro) improve rate of oral route recovery?

Emerging Evidence

Diabetes-specific nutritional formula-pro (DSNF-Pro) appears to improve Rate of oral route recovery.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Rate of oral route recovery

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Aug 2026

Does Diabetes-specific nutritional formula-pro (DSNF-Pro) improve length of stay in intensive care?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Diabetes-specific nutritional formula-pro (DSNF-Pro) for Length of stay in intensive care.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Length of stay in intensive care

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Aug 2026

Does Diabetes-specific nutritional formula-pro (DSNF-Pro) improve mortality rate at 30 days post-intervention?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Diabetes-specific nutritional formula-pro (DSNF-Pro) for Mortality rate at 30 days post-intervention.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Mortality rate at 30 days post-intervention

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Aug 2026

Does Diabetes-specific nutritional formula-pro (DSNF-Pro) improve incidence of hyperglycaemia during enteral nutrition treatment?

Emerging Evidence

Diabetes-specific nutritional formula-pro (DSNF-Pro) may worsen Incidence of hyperglycaemia during enteral nutrition treatment or be associated with harm.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Incidence of hyperglycaemia during enteral nutrition treatment

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | moderate negative | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Aug 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.