Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

E-health program may improve self-management in type 2 diabetes

Last updated August 25, 2026

Key finding

Lack of necessary diabetes knowledge was common.

This qualitative study explored user preferences for an e-health program aimed at lifestyle modification for type 2 diabetes, highlighting key areas for improvement.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Short-Term (≤3 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This qualitative study explored user preferences for an e-health program aimed at lifestyle modification for type 2 diabetes, highlighting key areas for improvement.

Clinical relevance

Understanding user preferences for e-health programs is vital for developing effective interventions for type 2 diabetes management. Tailoring content and providing essential education can significantly enhance patient engagement and self-management, ultimately leading to better health outcomes.

Keep in mind

The effectiveness of the intervention remains unclear. Limited generalizability due to the specific population studied. Potential biases in self-reported data from participants.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Tina R, Anne-Marie A, André H, et al. User preferences for a comprehensive e-health program for type 2 diabetes: A qualitative study. PLOS ONE. 2025;20(3):e0318876. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0318876

Main Effects

Participants commonly reported a lack of necessary diabetes knowledge.

Education was deemed essential for improving self-management.

Tailoring program functionalities and content was considered crucial for participant satisfaction.

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes and Diabetes knowledge, Diabetes self-management behaviors, Program satisfaction.

Primary intervention

Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes

Primary outcomes

  • Diabetes knowledge
  • Diabetes self-management behaviors
  • Program satisfaction

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

3
Evidence pairs
3
Relationships
2
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 68

2

Related topics

3

Evidence pairs

167

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 3 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 2 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker

Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Primary evidence

Evidence topic

Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy

matched_outcome

Related evidence

Evidence topic

Treatment Adherence

Save evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Diabetes knowledge

Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes → Diabetes knowledge

Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes → Diabetes knowledge

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Diabetes self-management behaviors

Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes → Diabetes self-management behaviors

Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes → Diabetes self-management behaviors

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Program satisfaction

Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes → Program satisfaction

Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes → Program satisfaction

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • Participants indicated a widespread lack of diabetes knowledge.
  • Education was highlighted as a key factor for self-management improvement.
  • Customization of program content was deemed essential for user satisfaction.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.
  • Individuals seeking lifestyle modification support.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • The study's findings may not apply to all demographics.
  • Results are based on qualitative data, which may include subjective biases.
  • Further research is needed to establish the effectiveness of the proposed e-health program.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • The effectiveness of the intervention remains unclear.
  • Limited generalizability due to the specific population studied.
  • Potential biases in self-reported data from participants.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes and Activities of Daily Living, Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes and Program satisfaction.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes improve diabetes self-management behaviors?

Emerging Evidence

Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes appears to improve diabetes self-management behaviors.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Diabetes self-management behaviors

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes improve diabetes knowledge?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes for diabetes knowledge.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Diabetes knowledge

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes improve program satisfaction?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes for program satisfaction.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Program satisfaction

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.