Last updated September 9, 2026
Key finding
TIR improved by 5.38% compared to controls (P = .001).
A study evaluated a gamified continuous glucose monitor app and Dexcom G6 in children, finding significant improvements in glycemic outcomes.
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Extended (5–20+ y)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
A study evaluated a gamified continuous glucose monitor app and Dexcom G6 in children, finding significant improvements in glycemic outcomes.
Improving glycemic control in children with diabetes is crucial for preventing long-term complications. This study highlights the potential of engaging digital health tools to enhance adherence and outcomes, suggesting that gamification can be an effective strategy in managing diabetes in pediatric populations.
Study design limited to a single population. Results may not generalize to all pediatric diabetes patients. Unclear long-term effects of the gamified app.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Farhaneh A, Alonso L. Gaming the System: A Fun Continuous Glucose Monitor Interface Improves Glycemic Outcomes for Children. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. 2024;19(3):836-842. doi:10.1177/19322968231223759
TIR improved by 5.38% compared to controls (P = .001).
TAR decreased by 5.80% compared to controls (P = .019).
Control group showed no significant change in TIR.
Control group showed no significant change in TAR.
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Continuous glucose monitoring, Remote multiprofessional educational program and Time above range, Time in range.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Continuous glucose monitoring
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
4
Related topics
4
Evidence pairs
930
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Primary evidence
Evidence relationship
Related evidence
Evidence relationship
Save evidence
Evidence topic
Save evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Continuous glucose monitoring → Time above range
Continuous glucose monitoring → Time above range
Continuous glucose monitoring → Time in range
Continuous glucose monitoring → Time in range
Remote multiprofessional educational program → Time above range
Remote multiprofessional educational program → Time above range
Remote multiprofessional educational program → Time in range
Remote multiprofessional educational program → Time in range
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Insulin Delivery Systems and CGM Time in Range, Insulin Delivery Systems and CGM Time in Range.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Devices & Technology
Devices & Technology
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring CGM Time in Range
Measures CGM Time in Range as a key outcome.
All studies on Insulin Delivery Systems
Contributes to Insulin Delivery Systems evidence base.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
13 results
5 results
13 results
13 results
5 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Insulin Delivery Systems may improve CGM Time in Range.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Ranked evidence signals
Time in range
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 85.2 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study
Time above range
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 82.7 | weak positive | ConsistencyScore™ Mixed | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs appear to improve CGM Time in Range.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Ranked evidence signals
Time in range
EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Time above range
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.
