Evidence Intelligence™
- EvidenceScore™
- Moderate
- Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
Supporting studies: Based on 2 studies
Add to Evidence TrackerResearch Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™
Mobile App Improves Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes
Last updated July 18, 2026
Key finding
Among participants aged <65 years, FPG at 6 months was significantly lower in the intervention group (mean difference -29.3 mg/dL; P = .03).
This study evaluated the effectiveness of the Rama Diabetes Care app for managing uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes in adults. While some improvements were noted, not all findings were statistically significant.
Quick read
Study at a glance
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
What this paper says
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated the effectiveness of the Rama Diabetes Care app for managing uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes in adults. While some improvements were noted, not all findings were statistically significant.
Clinical relevance
Understanding the effectiveness of mobile health interventions like the Rama Diabetes Care app is crucial for improving diabetes management strategies. This study highlights potential benefits for younger adults while indicating that further research is needed to confirm broader effectiveness.
Keep in mind
The HbA1c reduction was not statistically significant. No significant changes were found in several other health metrics. The study's findings may not be generalizable to older adults. User satisfaction ratings were moderate, indicating room for improvement.
Published in
Journal Reference
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Supasuta W, Wannaporn P, Chutintorn S, Sheyu L. Effectiveness of a Mobile App for Diabetes Self-Management in Adults with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Diabetes. 2025;10:e83685. doi:10.2196/83685
Main Effects
The intervention group showed a reduction in HbA1c of -0.24%, but this was not statistically significant (P = .13).
Fasting plasma glucose decreased by -29.3 mg/dL in participants aged <65 years (P = .03).
No significant changes were observed in LDL cholesterol, eGFR, BMI, or self-care behaviors.
User satisfaction with the app was rated as moderate.
Evidence network
How this study fits
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
Evidence Context
This study contributes evidence to Rama Diabetes Care app and BMI, Diabetes self-management behaviors, Estimated glomerular filtration rate, and 4 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Rama Diabetes Care app
Primary outcomes
- BMI
- Diabetes self-management behaviors
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate
Primary intervention
Evidence relationships
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
7
Evidence pairs
7
Relationships
5
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence
Editorial context
Why this study matters
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 72
5
Related topics
7
Evidence pairs
958
Related studies
High relevance in at least one topic
Why it is useful
- Contributes to 7 evidence relationships
- Includes primary outcome data
- Linked to 5 direct semantic evidence topics
Topic contributions
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker
Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Primary evidence
Evidence topic
Diabetes Technology
matched_intervention_and_outcome
Related evidence
Evidence topic
Glycemic Control
Save evidence
Core evidence
Study findings
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Diabetes self-management behaviors
Rama Diabetes Care app → Diabetes self-management behaviors
Rama Diabetes Care app → Diabetes self-management behaviors
Evidence Intelligence™
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence TrackerEstimated glomerular filtration rate
Rama Diabetes Care app → Estimated glomerular filtration rate
Rama Diabetes Care app → Estimated glomerular filtration rate
Evidence Intelligence™
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence TrackerFasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Rama Diabetes Care app → Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Rama Diabetes Care app → Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Evidence Intelligence™
- EvidenceScore™
- Moderate
- Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
- ImpactScore™
- 75
- Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 35
- mixed
Supporting studies: Based on 2 studies
Add to Evidence TrackerEvidence Intelligence™
- EvidenceScore™
- Strong
- Score 79 · Based on 3 studies
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- 100
- consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 3 studies
Add to Evidence TrackerEvidence Intelligence™
- EvidenceScore™
- Moderate
- Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- 100
- consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 2 studies
Add to Evidence TrackerParticipants' satisfaction evaluation of the APP
Rama Diabetes Care app → Participants' satisfaction evaluation of the APP
Rama Diabetes Care app → Participants' satisfaction evaluation of the APP
Evidence Intelligence™
- EvidenceScore™
- Moderate
- Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
- ImpactScore™
- 75
- Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 35
- mixed
Supporting studies: Based on 2 studies
Add to Evidence TrackerEvidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Suggest
- Fasting plasma glucose decreased significantly in younger participants by -29.3 mg/dL (P = .03).
- Overall HbA1c reduction was -0.24%, but not statistically significant (P = .13).
- User satisfaction with the app was rated as moderate.
Who this applies to
- Adults aged 18-65 with uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes.
- Individuals interested in mobile health interventions for diabetes management.
Keep in Mind
- The study's sample may not represent older adults with diabetes.
- Statistical significance does not imply clinical relevance for all outcomes.
- Further research is needed to confirm the app's effectiveness across diverse populations.
- Moderate user satisfaction suggests potential for app improvements.
Between the Lines
- The HbA1c reduction was not statistically significant.
- No significant changes were found in several other health metrics.
- The study's findings may not be generalizable to older adults.
- User satisfaction ratings were moderate, indicating room for improvement.
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Connected Evidence
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Rama Diabetes Care app and HbA1c, Rama Diabetes Care app and Body Mass Index.
Related evidence relationships
Explore in Evidence ExplorerThis study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Rama Diabetes Care app → HbA1c
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Evidence Intelligence™
- EvidenceScore™
- Strong
- Score 79 · Based on 3 studies
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- 100
- consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 3 studies
View evidenceBehavioral & Lifestyle
Rama Diabetes Care app → Body Mass Index
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Evidence Intelligence™
- EvidenceScore™
- Moderate
- Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
Supporting studies: Based on 2 studies
View evidenceBehavioral & Lifestyle
Rama Diabetes Care app → Adipokine and Angiogenic Markers
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Evidence Intelligence™
- EvidenceScore™
- Moderate
- Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- 100
- consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 2 studies
View evidenceIncluded in these evidence collections
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
HbA1c Evidence Hub
All studies measuring HbA1c
3 studies
outcome_hubMeasures HbA1c as a key outcome.
Rama Diabetes Care app Evidence Hub
All studies on Rama Diabetes Care app
3 studies
intervention_hubContributes to Rama Diabetes Care app evidence base.
Adipokine and Angiogenic Markers Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Adipokine and Angiogenic Markers
2 studies
outcome_hubMeasures Adipokine and Angiogenic Markers as a key outcome.
Body Mass Index Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Body Mass Index
2 studies
outcome_hubMeasures Body Mass Index as a key outcome.
Recent Diabetes Research
Latest published studies
recency_collection
Published within the last 2 years.
Explore more in Evidence Explorer
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
All studies on Rama Diabetes Care app and HbA1c
Intervention: Rama Diabetes Care appOutcome: HbA1c
3 results
All studies on Rama Diabetes Care app and BMI
Intervention: Rama Diabetes Care appOutcome: BMI
2 results
All studies on Rama Diabetes Care app
Intervention: Rama Diabetes Care app
3 results
All studies measuring HbA1c
Outcome: HbA1c
3 results
All studies measuring BMI
Outcome: BMI
2 results
Questions answered by this study
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Does Rama Diabetes Care app improve HbA1c?
Strong Evidence
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Rama Diabetes Care app for HbA1c.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 79.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Rama Diabetes Care app improve fasting plasma glucose (fpg)?
Moderate Evidence
Rama Diabetes Care app may improve Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG).
ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Evidence caveat: The available evidence reports mixed findings.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.0 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Mixed | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Rama Diabetes Care app improve participants' satisfaction evaluation of the app?
Moderate Evidence
Rama Diabetes Care app may improve Participants' satisfaction evaluation of the APP.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Evidence caveat: The available evidence reports mixed findings.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Participants' satisfaction evaluation of the APP
EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.0 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Mixed | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Rama Diabetes Care app improve ldl cholesterol?
Moderate Evidence
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Rama Diabetes Care app for LDL cholesterol.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
LDL cholesterol
EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Population details are unavailable.
Next steps
Continue your research
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Evidence topics
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Explore in Evidence Explorer
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Related research
Read related research summaries.
Smartphone app shows little effect on physical activity in type 2 diabetesHRS-7535 improves glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetesMediterranean ketogenic eating matched VLCKD for weight loss over 3 monthsCombined Antioxidant and Prebiotic Supplementation Improves T2 Diabetes OutcomesDietary supplements may lower diabetes risk in prediabetes
No ads. No tracking.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.