BMI
Rama Diabetes Care app → BMI
Rama Diabetes Care app → BMI
Evidence profile
Key finding
We found no significant effect of the intervention on MVPA at 3 months (β=1.51, 95% CI -5.53 to 8.55).
This study evaluated the impact of the DiaCert smartphone app on physical activity levels in adults with Type 2 diabetes. Results indicated no significant improvements in moderate to vigorous physical activity or other health metrics.
Evidence strength
Moderate confidence
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
Population
Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes
Intervention
DiaCert app
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Primary outcome
Moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at 3 months
Comparator
Standard care only
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated the impact of the DiaCert smartphone app on physical activity levels in adults with Type 2 diabetes. Results indicated no significant improvements in moderate to vigorous physical activity or other health metrics.
Understanding the effectiveness of mHealth interventions like the DiaCert app is crucial for developing strategies to improve physical activity in adults with Type 2 diabetes. Given the rising prevalence of diabetes, identifying effective tools to promote lifestyle changes is essential for enhancing patient care and health outcomes.
The study did not show significant improvements in primary outcomes. The sample size and demographic characteristics may limit generalizability. Potential unmeasured confounders could affect the results.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Taiane DAC, Ida T, Adrián M, et al. Effect of a Smartphone App on Physical Activity in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Interactive Journal of Medical Research. 2024;13:e53054. doi:10.2196/53054
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
No significant change in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at 3 months (β=1.51, 95% CI -5.53 to 8.55).
No significant change in MVPA at 6 months (β=-3.53, 95% CI -10.97 to 3.92).
Significant effect on BMI at 6 months (β=0.52, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.84), but no mean difference between groups.
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Rama Diabetes Care app and BMI, Diastolic blood pressure, HDL cholesterol, and 7 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Rama Diabetes Care app
Primary outcomes
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
5
Related topics
10
Evidence pairs
371
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Rama Diabetes Care app → BMI
Rama Diabetes Care app → BMI
Evidence profile
Rama Diabetes Care app → Diastolic blood pressure
Rama Diabetes Care app → Diastolic blood pressure
Evidence profile
Rama Diabetes Care app → HbA1c
Rama Diabetes Care app → HbA1c
Evidence profile
Rama Diabetes Care app → HDL cholesterol
Rama Diabetes Care app → HDL cholesterol
Evidence profile
Rama Diabetes Care app → LDL cholesterol
Rama Diabetes Care app → LDL cholesterol
Evidence profile
Rama Diabetes Care app → Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
Rama Diabetes Care app → Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
Evidence profile
Rama Diabetes Care app → Systolic blood pressure
Rama Diabetes Care app → Systolic blood pressure
Evidence profile
Rama Diabetes Care app → Total cholesterol
Rama Diabetes Care app → Total cholesterol
Evidence profile
Rama Diabetes Care app → Triglycerides
Rama Diabetes Care app → Triglycerides
Evidence profile
Rama Diabetes Care app → Waist circumference
Rama Diabetes Care app → Waist circumference
Evidence profile
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Rama Diabetes Care app for HbA1c.
ConsensusScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 39.9 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Rama Diabetes Care app for Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week).
ConsensusScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 34.2 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Rama Diabetes Care app for BMI.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
BMI
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 34.2 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Rama Diabetes Care app for Diastolic blood pressure.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Diastolic blood pressure
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 34.2 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.