Last updated August 29, 2026
Key finding
In RCT 1, the PA intervention group showed an increase in accelerometer-measured moderate physical activity (P = .05).
The MyPlan 2.0 intervention aimed to enhance physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior in adults with Type 2 diabetes, showing promising results in several outcomes.
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Extended (5–20+ y)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
The MyPlan 2.0 intervention aimed to enhance physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior in adults with Type 2 diabetes, showing promising results in several outcomes.
Improving physical activity and reducing sedentary behavior are crucial for managing Type 2 diabetes. This intervention could help individuals make sustainable lifestyle changes that enhance their health and well-being, potentially leading to better diabetes management and reduced risk of complications.
The effectiveness of the intervention remains unclear for some outcomes. The study may have limited generalizability due to specific population characteristics. Sample size and diversity were not detailed, which could affect results.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Gunther E, David G, Minh HN, et al. MyPlan 2.0: A Self-Regulation-Based eHealth and mHealth Intervention to Improve Physical Activity and Reduce Sedentary Behavior in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2019;21(8):e13363. doi:10.2196/13363
The PA intervention group showed a 61.98 min/day increase in accelerometer-measured moderate physical activity (P = 0.05).
The SB intervention group showed a 1.23 breaks/day increase in accelerometer-assessed breaks from sedentary time (P = 0.005).
The PA intervention group reported a 10.34 min/day increase in self-reported total physical activity (P = 0.003).
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to MyPlan 2.0 and Accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, Bone mineral density (BMD) at femoral neck, Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week), and 1 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
MyPlan 2.0
Primary outcomes
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
3
Related topics
4
Evidence pairs
130
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Primary evidence
Evidence topic
matched_outcome
Related evidence
Evidence topic
Save evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
MyPlan 2.0 → Accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
MyPlan 2.0 → Accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
MyPlan 2.0 → Bone mineral density (BMD) at femoral neck
MyPlan 2.0 → Bone mineral density (BMD) at femoral neck
MyPlan 2.0 → Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
MyPlan 2.0 → Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
MyPlan 2.0 → Self-reported time spent sitting
MyPlan 2.0 → Self-reported time spent sitting
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on MyPlan 2.0 and Accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, MyPlan 2.0 and Bone Mineral Density.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring Accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
Measures Accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity as a key outcome.
All studies measuring Bone Mineral Density
Measures Bone Mineral Density as a key outcome.
All studies on MyPlan 2.0
Contributes to MyPlan 2.0 evidence base.
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
MyPlan 2.0 appears to improve Accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
MyPlan 2.0 appears to improve Bone mineral density (BMD) at femoral neck.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Bone mineral density (BMD) at femoral neck
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
MyPlan 2.0 appears to improve Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week).
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of MyPlan 2.0 for Self-reported time spent sitting.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Self-reported time spent sitting
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.
