Last updated August 25, 2026
Key finding
LI group experienced a mean change of 30.9 MET-hrs/week (p = 0.05).
The Estudio PARTO trial evaluated culturally tailored lifestyle interventions to reduce type 2 diabetes risk factors in postpartum Hispanic women, showing improvements in physical activity levels.
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
The Estudio PARTO trial evaluated culturally tailored lifestyle interventions to reduce type 2 diabetes risk factors in postpartum Hispanic women, showing improvements in physical activity levels.
This study highlights the importance of culturally tailored interventions for improving health outcomes in specific populations. By effectively increasing physical activity levels among postpartum Hispanic women, these interventions can potentially reduce the risk of developing type 2 diabetes, which is a significant health concern in this demographic.
Effectiveness of interventions remains unclear due to limited data. Sample size and demographic specificity may limit generalizability. Potential unmeasured confounders could influence outcomes.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Sarah B, Bess HM, Penelope P, et al. Estudio PARTO: A culturally modified, motivationally targeted, individually-tailored lifestyle intervention to reduce risk factors for type 2 diabetes among postpartum Hispanic women. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(7):e0236408. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236408
LI group experienced a mean increase of 30.9 MET-hrs/week in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (p = 0.05).
HW group experienced a mean increase of 27.6 MET-hrs/week in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (p = 0.01).
LI group showed a mean increase of 1.3 MET-hrs/week in vigorous physical activity (p = 0.03).
LI group suggested a greater decrease in sedentary activity compared to HW group (β = -3.56, p = 0.09).
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Complex lifestyle intervention, General wellness information control and Exercise self-efficacy, Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week), Sedentary behavior, and 1 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Complex lifestyle intervention
Primary outcomes
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
4
Related topics
5
Evidence pairs
450
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Primary evidence
Evidence relationship
Related evidence
Evidence relationship
Save evidence
Evidence topic
Save evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Complex lifestyle intervention → Exercise self-efficacy
Complex lifestyle intervention → Exercise self-efficacy
Complex lifestyle intervention → Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
Complex lifestyle intervention → Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
Complex lifestyle intervention → Sedentary behavior
Complex lifestyle intervention → Sedentary behavior
Complex lifestyle intervention → Vigorous physical activity
Complex lifestyle intervention → Vigorous physical activity
General wellness information control → Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
General wellness information control → Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy, Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Physical Activity Levels.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy
Measures Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy as a key outcome.
All studies on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs
Contributes to Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs evidence base.
All studies measuring Physical Activity Levels
Measures Physical Activity Levels as a key outcome.
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs appears to improve Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Exercise self-efficacy
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 18 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Physical Activity Levels.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Ranked evidence signals
Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Limitations
Complex lifestyle intervention appears to improve Vigorous physical activity.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Vigorous physical activity
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
General wellness information control appears to improve Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week).
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.
