Last updated July 11, 2026
Key finding
The mean score in the intervention group was 97.02 ± 15.27, compared with 77.71 ± 11.55 in the control group.
This study examined the impact of a nursing approach based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model on health behaviors and sleep quality in women with gestational diabetes, finding significant improvements in various health metrics.
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Short-Term (≤3 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study examined the impact of a nursing approach based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model on health behaviors and sleep quality in women with gestational diabetes, finding significant improvements in various health metrics.
Improving health behaviors and sleep quality in women with gestational diabetes is crucial, as these factors can influence both maternal and fetal health outcomes. This study provides evidence that targeted nursing interventions can effectively enhance lifestyle changes, which may lead to better management of gestational diabetes and overall health.
The study design was non-randomized, which may introduce bias. Sample size and demographic diversity may limit generalizability. Effectiveness of the intervention was classified as unclear.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Fatima KA, Amira MAA, Rabia HH, et al. The Effect of a Nursing Approach Based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED Model on Health Behaviors and Sleep Quality Among Women with Gestational Diabetes. Women's Health. 2026;22:17455057261442707. doi:10.1177/17455057261442707
Total health-promoting lifestyle score increased by 19.31 points (p=0.001).
Nutrition score improved by 4.12 points (p=0.001).
Sleep disturbance score decreased by 3.04 points (p=0.001).
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to MDT nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention and Nutrition score measured by HPLP-II, Overall health-promoting lifestyle score measured by HPLP-II, Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week), and 2 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
MDT nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention
Primary outcomes
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
2
Related topics
5
Evidence pairs
60
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Follow the evidence behind this paper in your workspace.
Primary evidence
Evidence topic
matched_outcome
Related evidence
Evidence topic
Follow evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
MDT nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention → Nutrition score measured by HPLP-II
MDT nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention → Nutrition score measured by HPLP-II
MDT nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention → Overall health-promoting lifestyle score measured by HPLP-II
MDT nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention → Overall health-promoting lifestyle score measured by HPLP-II
MDT nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention → Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
MDT nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention → Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
MDT nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention → Sleep disturbance score measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
MDT nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention → Sleep disturbance score measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
MDT nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention → Stress score
MDT nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention → Stress score
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on MDT nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention and Nutrition score measured by HPLP-II, MDT nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention and Physical Activity Levels.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies on MDT nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention
Contributes to MDT nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention evidence base.
All studies measuring Nutrition score measured by HPLP-II
Measures Nutrition score measured by HPLP-II as a key outcome.
All studies measuring Physical Activity Levels
Measures Physical Activity Levels as a key outcome.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
MDT nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention appears to improve Nutrition score measured by HPLP-II.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Nutrition score measured by HPLP-II
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
MDT nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention appears to improve Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week).
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
MDT nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention appears to improve Sleep disturbance score measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Sleep disturbance score measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
MDT nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention may worsen Overall health-promoting lifestyle score measured by HPLP-II or be associated with harm.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Overall health-promoting lifestyle score measured by HPLP-II
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | moderate negative | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.
