- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Nutrition education shows equivalent effects on glycemic control in type 1 diabetes
Last updated September 11, 2026
Key finding
There were no significant differences at 12 months in HbA1c; FBA versus RC (−0.4 mmol/mol (1.3), 0.04% (0.1%)).
This study evaluated the effects of a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting, and routine care on adults with type 1 diabetes. It found no significant differences in HbA1c levels after 12 months.
Quick read
Study at a glance
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
What this paper says
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated the effects of a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting, and routine care on adults with type 1 diabetes. It found no significant differences in HbA1c levels after 12 months.
Clinical relevance
Understanding effective dietary strategies for managing type 1 diabetes is crucial for improving patient outcomes. This study highlights that while dietary improvements can be achieved with a food-based approach, they may not directly translate into better blood sugar control, which is essential for long-term health.
Keep in mind
The study did not demonstrate significant changes in HbA1c levels. The sample size and demographic characteristics may limit generalizability. The long-term effects of dietary changes were not assessed beyond 12 months.
Published in
Journal Reference
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Sofia SI, Margareta BB, Björn E, et al. Nutrition education using a food-based approach, carbohydrate counting, or routine care in adults with type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care. 2021;9(1):e001971. doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001971
Main Effects
FBA showed improved intake of legumes, nuts, and vegetables compared to CC and RC.
FBA reported higher intake of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats compared to RC.
No significant differences in HbA1c levels were found among the three groups at 12 months.
Evidence network
How this study fits
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
Evidence Context
This study contributes evidence to Carbohydrate Counting (CC), Control: Routine Care, Food-based approach (FBA) and HbA1c, Consumption of nuts, Consumption of vegetables, and 3 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Carbohydrate Counting (CC)
Primary outcomes
- HbA1c
- Consumption of nuts
- Consumption of vegetables
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Evidence relationships
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
Why this study matters
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
1
Related topics
8
Evidence pairs
603
Related studies
Why it is useful
- Contributes to 8 evidence relationships
- Includes primary outcome data
- Linked to 1 direct semantic evidence topic
Topic contributions
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker
Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Primary evidence
Evidence topic
HbA1c Reduction
matched_outcome
Core evidence
Study findings
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Consumption of nuts
Food-based approach (FBA) → Consumption of nuts
Food-based approach (FBA) → Consumption of nuts
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Consumption of vegetables
Food-based approach (FBA) → Consumption of vegetables
Food-based approach (FBA) → Consumption of vegetables
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Intake of legumes
Food-based approach (FBA) → Intake of legumes
Food-based approach (FBA) → Intake of legumes
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Polyunsaturated fatty acid intake
Food-based approach (FBA) → Polyunsaturated fatty acid intake
Food-based approach (FBA) → Polyunsaturated fatty acid intake
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Reported intake of monounsaturated fat
Food-based approach (FBA) → Reported intake of monounsaturated fat
Food-based approach (FBA) → Reported intake of monounsaturated fat
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Suggest
- FBA improved dietary intake of healthy foods without affecting HbA1c levels.
- No significant HbA1c differences were observed between FBA, CC, and RC.
- FBA led to higher consumption of beneficial fats compared to routine care.
Who this applies to
- Adults diagnosed with type 1 diabetes.
- Individuals seeking dietary management strategies for diabetes.
Keep in Mind
- The findings may not apply to populations outside the study's demographic.
- The lack of significant HbA1c change suggests dietary improvements alone may not suffice for blood sugar control.
- Further research is needed to explore long-term effects of dietary interventions.
Between the Lines
- The study did not demonstrate significant changes in HbA1c levels.
- The sample size and demographic characteristics may limit generalizability.
- The long-term effects of dietary changes were not assessed beyond 12 months.
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Connected Evidence
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Carbohydrate Counting (CC) and HbA1c, Control: Routine Care and HbA1c.
Related evidence relationships
Explore in Evidence ExplorerThis study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Carbohydrate Counting (CC) → HbA1c
Behavioral & Lifestyle
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Included in these evidence collections
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
Carbohydrate Counting (CC) Evidence Hub
All studies on Carbohydrate Counting (CC)
Contributes to Carbohydrate Counting (CC) evidence base.
Control: Routine Care Evidence Hub
All studies on Control: Routine Care
Contributes to Control: Routine Care evidence base.
HbA1c Evidence Hub
All studies measuring HbA1c
Measures HbA1c as a key outcome.
Explore more in Evidence Explorer
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
All studies on Carbohydrate Counting (CC) and HbA1c
1 results
All studies on Control: Routine Care and HbA1c
1 results
All studies on Carbohydrate Counting (CC)
1 results
All studies on Control: Routine Care
1 results
All studies measuring HbA1c
1 results
Questions answered by this study
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Does Food-based approach (FBA) improve consumption of nuts?
Food-based approach (FBA) appears to improve consumption of nuts.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Consumption of nuts
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
Does Food-based approach (FBA) improve consumption of vegetables?
Food-based approach (FBA) appears to improve consumption of vegetables.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Consumption of vegetables
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
Does Food-based approach (FBA) improve intake of legumes?
Food-based approach (FBA) appears to improve intake of legumes.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Intake of legumes
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
Does Food-based approach (FBA) improve polyunsaturated fatty acid intake?
Food-based approach (FBA) appears to improve polyunsaturated fatty acid intake.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Polyunsaturated fatty acid intake
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
Next steps
Continue your research
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Explore in Evidence Explorer
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Related research
Read related research summaries.
No ads. No tracking.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.
