Last updated July 11, 2026
Key finding
Caregivers expressed satisfaction with diabetes management and psychosocial support.
This qualitative study explored the experiences of rural caregivers managing children with Type 1 Diabetes, highlighting their challenges and support needs.
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Short-Term (≤3 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This qualitative study explored the experiences of rural caregivers managing children with Type 1 Diabetes, highlighting their challenges and support needs.
Understanding the experiences of rural caregivers is crucial for developing effective support systems and interventions. By addressing their unique challenges, healthcare providers can enhance the quality of care for both caregivers and children with Type 1 Diabetes, ultimately leading to better health outcomes.
The study's non-randomized design limits generalizability. Sample size and demographic characteristics may not represent all caregivers. The subjective nature of qualitative data may introduce bias. Lack of quantitative measures to support findings.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Vanessa DJ, Katie JF, Alexis C, et al. Exploring the Lived Experience of Rural Caregivers of Children with Type 1 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study. Otjr. 2024;45(3):370-377. doi:10.1177/15394492241280916
Caregivers expressed satisfaction with diabetes management and psychosocial support.
They reported improved quality of life linked to positive changes in their child's diabetes management.
Occupational deprivation was a significant concern due to caregiving demands.
Sleep disturbances were consistently reported as a challenge.
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Occupation-based coaching (OBC) intervention and Diabetes social support, Occupational deprivation, Quality of life, and 2 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Occupation-based coaching (OBC) intervention
Primary outcomes
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
0
Related topics
5
Evidence pairs
0
Related studies
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Occupation-based coaching (OBC) intervention → Diabetes social support
Occupation-based coaching (OBC) intervention → Diabetes social support
Occupation-based coaching (OBC) intervention → Occupational deprivation
Occupation-based coaching (OBC) intervention → Occupational deprivation
Occupation-based coaching (OBC) intervention → Quality of life
Occupation-based coaching (OBC) intervention → Quality of life
Occupation-based coaching (OBC) intervention → Satisfaction with diabetes management
Occupation-based coaching (OBC) intervention → Satisfaction with diabetes management
Occupation-based coaching (OBC) intervention → Sleep quality
Occupation-based coaching (OBC) intervention → Sleep quality
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Occupation-based coaching (OBC) intervention and Diabetes social support, Occupation-based coaching (OBC) intervention and Occupational deprivation.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring Diabetes social support
Measures Diabetes social support as a key outcome.
All studies on Occupation-based coaching (OBC) intervention
Contributes to Occupation-based coaching (OBC) intervention evidence base.
All studies measuring Occupational deprivation
Measures Occupational deprivation as a key outcome.
All studies measuring Quality of Life Outcomes
Measures Quality of Life Outcomes as a key outcome.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Occupation-based coaching (OBC) intervention appears to improve Diabetes social support.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Diabetes social support
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Occupation-based coaching (OBC) intervention appears to improve Quality of life.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Quality of life
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Occupation-based coaching (OBC) intervention appears to improve Satisfaction with diabetes management.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Satisfaction with diabetes management
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Occupation-based coaching (OBC) intervention for Occupational deprivation.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Occupational deprivation
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.
