Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Online program may improve physical activity in children with T1DM

Last updated August 29, 2026

Key finding

Self-reported sedentary behaviour decreased by 2.28.

The SKIP study evaluated an interactive intervention to support children with diabetes in physical activity, showing decreased sedentary behavior and improved parent-reported physical health.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Short-Term (≤3 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

The SKIP study evaluated an interactive intervention to support children with diabetes in physical activity, showing decreased sedentary behavior and improved parent-reported physical health.

Clinical relevance

These findings highlight the potential of interactive interventions to encourage physical activity among children with diabetes, which is crucial for managing their health. Reducing sedentary behavior and improving perceived physical health can lead to better overall well-being and may influence long-term health outcomes.

Keep in mind

Effectiveness of the intervention remains unclear due to limited evidence. Study results may not be generalizable to all children with diabetes. Potential biases in self-reported measures.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Emily K, Cris G, Tabitha R, et al. The SKIP study: Supporting Kids with Diabetes in Physical Activity. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:371. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-6697-1

Main Effects

Self-reported sedentary behavior decreased by 2.28 units (p=0.04).

Parent-reported physical health of the child increased by 6.15 units (p=0.01).

No significant difference in HbA1c levels between groups.

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment and Change in parent-reported physical health of the child, Change in self-reported sedentary behaviour, HbA1c.

Primary intervention

TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment

Primary outcomes

  • Change in parent-reported physical health of the child
  • Change in self-reported sedentary behaviour
  • HbA1c

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

3
Evidence pairs
3
Relationships
1
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 59

1

Related topics

3

Evidence pairs

603

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 3 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 1 direct semantic evidence topic

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker

Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Primary evidence

Evidence relationship

Telehealth Interventions and HbA1c

Related evidence

Evidence topic

HbA1c Reduction

Save evidence

Intervention

Telehealth Interventions

Save evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Change in parent-reported physical health of the child

TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment → Change in parent-reported physical health of the child

TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment → Change in parent-reported physical health of the child

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Change in self-reported sedentary behaviour

TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment → Change in self-reported sedentary behaviour

TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment → Change in self-reported sedentary behaviour

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

HbA1c

TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment → HbA1c

TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment → HbA1c

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
ImpactScore™
75
Positive
ConsistencyScore™
35
mixed
Supporting studies: Based on 2 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • Self-reported sedentary behavior decreased significantly by 2.28 units.
  • Parent-reported physical health improved by 6.15 units.
  • No significant change in HbA1c levels was observed.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Children diagnosed with diabetes.
  • Participants involved in physical activity interventions.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • The study's findings are based on self-reported data, which may introduce bias.
  • Results may not apply to children outside the study's demographic.
  • Further research is needed to clarify the long-term effects of the intervention.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • Effectiveness of the intervention remains unclear due to limited evidence.
  • Study results may not be generalizable to all children with diabetes.
  • Potential biases in self-reported measures.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Telehealth Interventions and HbA1c, Telehealth Interventions and Change in parent-reported physical health of the child.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Explore more in Evidence Explorer

Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Telehealth Interventions lower HbA1c?

Strong Evidence

Telehealth Interventions may lower HbA1c.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    HbA1c

    EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.0 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Mixed | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 3 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.

3 supporting studies

Does TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment improve change in parent-reported physical health of the child?

Emerging Evidence

TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment appears to improve change in parent-reported physical health of the child.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Change in parent-reported physical health of the child

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment improve change in self-reported sedentary behaviour?

Emerging Evidence

TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment appears to improve change in self-reported sedentary behaviour.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Change in self-reported sedentary behaviour

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.