- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Self-management interventions enhance health in type 2 diabetes patients.
Last updated September 12, 2026
Key finding
PD significantly decreased in G3 compared with G0 (mean difference = -0.253 mm, P = 0.009).
This study evaluated the impact of integrated self-management interventions on periodontal health and metabolic control in adults with type 2 diabetes, finding significant improvements in several health metrics.
Quick read
Study at a glance
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
What this paper says
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated the impact of integrated self-management interventions on periodontal health and metabolic control in adults with type 2 diabetes, finding significant improvements in several health metrics.
Clinical relevance
Improving periodontal health and metabolic control is crucial for adults with type 2 diabetes, as these factors can significantly affect overall health and quality of life. The findings suggest that integrated self-management strategies can be effective in managing both oral and metabolic health, potentially reducing the risk of complications associated with diabetes.
Keep in mind
The study did not assess long-term effects beyond the intervention period. Sample size and diversity may limit generalizability of findings. Potential confounding factors were not fully controlled.
Published in
Journal Reference
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Yi Z, Nan Z, Yijia C, Chenchen W, Hao X, Xin H. Integrated self-management interventions improve periodontal health and metabolic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. Scientific Reports. 2026;16:25378. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-55674-8
Main Effects
Probing depth decreased by 0.253 mm in the intervention group (P = 0.009).
Clinical attachment loss decreased by 0.429 mm in the intervention group (P = 0.017).
Fasting plasma glucose decreased by 0.687 mmol/L in the intervention group (P = 0.003).
Evidence network
How this study fits
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
Evidence Context
This study contributes evidence to Comprehensive intervention group (G3) and BMI, Clinical attachment level, Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG), and 3 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Comprehensive intervention group (G3)
Primary outcomes
- BMI
- Clinical attachment level
- Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Evidence relationships
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
Why this study matters
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
4
Related topics
6
Evidence pairs
1865
Related studies
Why it is useful
- Contributes to 6 evidence relationships
- Includes primary outcome data
- Linked to 4 direct semantic evidence topics
Topic contributions
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker
Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Primary evidence
Evidence topic
Fasting Blood Glucose
matched_outcome
Related evidence
Evidence topic
Glycemic Control
Save evidence
Core evidence
Study findings
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Clinical attachment level
Comprehensive intervention group (G3) → Clinical attachment level
Comprehensive intervention group (G3) → Clinical attachment level
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Comprehensive intervention group (G3) → Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Comprehensive intervention group (G3) → Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Healthy Lifestyle Score (HLS)
Comprehensive intervention group (G3) → Healthy Lifestyle Score (HLS)
Comprehensive intervention group (G3) → Healthy Lifestyle Score (HLS)
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 25
- Negative
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Periodontal probing depth
Comprehensive intervention group (G3) → Periodontal probing depth
Comprehensive intervention group (G3) → Periodontal probing depth
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Suggest
- Healthy lifestyle scores improved by 0.287 points (P < 0.001).
- Glycated hemoglobin levels were lower by 0.387% in the intervention group (P = 0.001).
- Body mass index decreased by 1.470 kg/m² in the intervention group (P < 0.001).
Who this applies to
- Adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.
- Individuals seeking to improve both oral and metabolic health.
Keep in Mind
- Results may not apply to populations outside the study's demographic.
- The intervention's effectiveness in real-world settings remains to be evaluated.
- Further research is needed to explore long-term sustainability of health improvements.
Between the Lines
- The study did not assess long-term effects beyond the intervention period.
- Sample size and diversity may limit generalizability of findings.
- Potential confounding factors were not fully controlled.
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Connected Evidence
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Comprehensive intervention group (G3) and Body Mass Index, Comprehensive intervention group (G3) and Clinical attachment level.
Related evidence relationships
Explore in Evidence ExplorerThis study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Comprehensive intervention group (G3) → Body Mass Index
Behavioral & Lifestyle
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Comprehensive intervention group (G3) → Clinical attachment level
Behavioral & Lifestyle
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Included in these evidence collections
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
Body Mass Index Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Body Mass Index
Measures Body Mass Index as a key outcome.
Clinical attachment level Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Clinical attachment level
Measures Clinical attachment level as a key outcome.
Comprehensive intervention group (G3) Evidence Hub
All studies on Comprehensive intervention group (G3)
Contributes to Comprehensive intervention group (G3) evidence base.
Recent Diabetes Research
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Explore more in Evidence Explorer
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
All studies on Comprehensive intervention group (G3) and BMI
1 results
All studies on Comprehensive intervention group (G3) and Clinical attachment level
1 results
All studies on Comprehensive intervention group (G3)
1 results
All studies measuring BMI
1 results
All studies measuring Clinical attachment level
1 results
Questions answered by this study
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Does Comprehensive intervention group (G3) affect BMI?
Comprehensive intervention group (G3) appears to affect BMI.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
BMI
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
Does Comprehensive intervention group (G3) improve clinical attachment level?
Comprehensive intervention group (G3) appears to improve clinical attachment level.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Clinical attachment level
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
Does Comprehensive intervention group (G3) improve fasting plasma glucose (FPG)?
Comprehensive intervention group (G3) appears to improve fasting plasma glucose (FPG).
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
Does Comprehensive intervention group (G3) lower HbA1c?
Comprehensive intervention group (G3) appears to lower HbA1c.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
Next steps
Continue your research
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Evidence topics
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Explore in Evidence Explorer
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Related research
Read related research summaries.
No ads. No tracking.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.
