Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Semaglutide improves vascular and liver function in type 2 diabetes

Last updated July 22, 2026

Key finding

Treatment with semaglutide resulted in a reduction of CAP score at 4 and at 12 months (P < .05).

This study investigated the effects of semaglutide on vascular and liver function in patients with type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, finding significant improvements in various health markers.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Long-Term (1–5 y)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study investigated the effects of semaglutide on vascular and liver function in patients with type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, finding significant improvements in various health markers.

Clinical relevance

These findings are clinically significant as they suggest that semaglutide may not only help manage blood sugar levels in type 2 diabetes but also improve liver function and reduce cardiovascular risks. This could lead to better overall health outcomes for patients suffering from both conditions.

Keep in mind

The study's sample size may limit the generalizability of the findings. The long-term effects of semaglutide beyond 12 months were not assessed. The study did not include a diverse population, which may affect applicability.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Emmanouil K, Aikaterini K, George P, et al. Effects of Semaglutide on Vascular and Liver Function in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Journal of the Endocrine Society. 2024;8(8):bvae122. doi:10.1210/jendso/bvae122

Main Effects

Semaglutide reduced the Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) score significantly at 4 and 12 months (P < .05).

Patients showed a greater decrease in central systolic blood pressure with semaglutide compared to controls (−6% vs −4%, P = .048).

Significant reductions in pulse wave velocity (PWV) were observed in the semaglutide group (−6% vs −3.5%, P = .019).

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, Semaglutide and Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24, Controlled attenuation parameter, FIB-4 index, and 5 more.

Primary intervention

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors

Primary outcomes

  • Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24
  • Controlled attenuation parameter
  • FIB-4 index

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

16
Evidence pairs
16
Relationships
2
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 64

2

Related topics

16

Evidence pairs

77

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 16 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 2 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker

Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Primary evidence

Evidence relationship

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Blood Pressure

Related evidence

Evidence relationship

DPP-4 Inhibitors and Blood Pressure

Save evidence

Evidence topic

DPP-4 Inhibitors

Save evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors → Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors → Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Controlled attenuation parameter

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors → Controlled attenuation parameter

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors → Controlled attenuation parameter

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

FIB-4 index

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors → FIB-4 index

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors → FIB-4 index

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Fibrosis improvement percentage

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors → Fibrosis improvement percentage

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors → Fibrosis improvement percentage

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

NAFLD Fibrosis Score

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors → NAFLD Fibrosis Score

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors → NAFLD Fibrosis Score

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Reduction in Augmentation Index (AIx)

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors → Reduction in Augmentation Index (AIx)

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors → Reduction in Augmentation Index (AIx)

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Reduction in Perfused Boundary Region (PBR) at 12 months

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors → Reduction in Perfused Boundary Region (PBR) at 12 months

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors → Reduction in Perfused Boundary Region (PBR) at 12 months

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Systolic blood pressure

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors → Systolic blood pressure

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors → Systolic blood pressure

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24

Semaglutide → Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24

Semaglutide → Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Controlled attenuation parameter

Semaglutide → Controlled attenuation parameter

Semaglutide → Controlled attenuation parameter

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

FIB-4 index

Semaglutide → FIB-4 index

Semaglutide → FIB-4 index

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Fibrosis improvement percentage

Semaglutide → Fibrosis improvement percentage

Semaglutide → Fibrosis improvement percentage

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

NAFLD Fibrosis Score

Semaglutide → NAFLD Fibrosis Score

Semaglutide → NAFLD Fibrosis Score

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
ImpactScore™
75
Positive
ConsistencyScore™
35
mixed
Supporting studies: Based on 2 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Reduction in Augmentation Index (AIx)

Semaglutide → Reduction in Augmentation Index (AIx)

Semaglutide → Reduction in Augmentation Index (AIx)

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Reduction in Perfused Boundary Region (PBR) at 12 months

Semaglutide → Reduction in Perfused Boundary Region (PBR) at 12 months

Semaglutide → Reduction in Perfused Boundary Region (PBR) at 12 months

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Systolic blood pressure

Semaglutide → Systolic blood pressure

Semaglutide → Systolic blood pressure

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
79
Strong
ImpactScore™
67
Slightly Positive
ConsistencyScore™
67
generally_consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 3 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • Semaglutide led to a significant reduction in liver fibrosis scores (P < .05).
  • Central systolic blood pressure decreased more in the semaglutide group (−6% vs −4%, P = .048).
  • Pulse wave velocity decreased significantly in patients treated with semaglutide (−6% vs −3.5%, P = .019).
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Adults aged 18-75 with type 2 diabetes.
  • Patients diagnosed with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • Results may not apply to populations outside the study's demographic.
  • Further research is needed to confirm long-term benefits of semaglutide.
  • The comparison treatment may not reflect all available options for diabetes management.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • The study's sample size may limit the generalizability of the findings.
  • The long-term effects of semaglutide beyond 12 months were not assessed.
  • The study did not include a diverse population, which may affect applicability.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Blood Pressure, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and NAFLD Fibrosis Score.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does GLP-1 Receptor Agonists improve blood pressure?

Strong Evidence

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists may improve Blood Pressure.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Systolic blood pressure

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 78.5 | weak positive | ConsistencyScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 9 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
9 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does DPP-4 Inhibitors improve blood pressure?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of DPP-4 Inhibitors for Blood Pressure.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Systolic blood pressure

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Semaglutide improve nafld fibrosis score?

Moderate Evidence

Semaglutide may improve NAFLD Fibrosis Score.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.

Evidence caveat: The available evidence reports mixed findings.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    NAFLD Fibrosis Score

    EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.0 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Mixed | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Semaglutide improve change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24?

Emerging Evidence

Semaglutide appears to improve Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.