Last updated August 25, 2026
Key finding
The 'increased walking' cluster showed the greatest increase in PAL.
The study examined the impact of a lifestyle intervention on physical activity behaviors, revealing significant increases in walking and cycling levels.
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
The study examined the impact of a lifestyle intervention on physical activity behaviors, revealing significant increases in walking and cycling levels.
Understanding how lifestyle interventions affect physical activity behaviors is crucial for designing effective health programs. The findings suggest that while certain activities can be increased, overall sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous activity may require different strategies to address. This knowledge can help healthcare providers tailor interventions to improve patient outcomes.
Effectiveness of the intervention remains unclear due to ambiguous evidence. No significant changes in sedentary time and moderate-to-vigorous activity limit the findings. The study's population characteristics may affect generalizability.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Leon K, Gareth S, Kelly AM, et al. Combining self-report and device-based measures provides better insights into the behaviours that change during an intervention. PLOS ONE. 2024;19(3):e0300646. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0300646
The 'increased walking' cluster showed a significant increase in physical activity level (1.5 units, p=0.001).
The 'increased cycling' cluster accumulated the highest amount of light physical activity (2 units, p=0.002).
No significant differences in sedentary time were found between clusters.
No significant differences in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity were observed after 12 months.
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes and Average light activity in minutes per day, Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week), Reduced sedentary time.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
3
Related topics
3
Evidence pairs
364
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Primary evidence
Evidence topic
matched_intervention_and_outcome
Related evidence
Evidence topic
Save evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes → Average light activity in minutes per day
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes → Average light activity in minutes per day
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes → Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes → Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes → Reduced sedentary time
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes → Reduced sedentary time
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes and Physical Activity Levels, Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes and Average light activity in minutes per day.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies on Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes
Contributes to Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes evidence base.
All studies measuring Physical Activity Levels
Measures Physical Activity Levels as a key outcome.
All studies measuring Average light activity in minutes per day
Measures Average light activity in minutes per day as a key outcome.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
4 results
1 results
4 results
4 results
1 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes appears to improve Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week).
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 75.4 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes appears to improve Average light activity in minutes per day.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Average light activity in minutes per day
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes for Reduced sedentary time.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Reduced sedentary time
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.
