Diabetes Distress

Evidence on improving diabetes distress

Evidence related to Diabetes Distress.

Build your Evidence Workspace

Save evidence about the topics you care about.

40
Studies
46
Evidence Pairs
Moderate Research
Evidence Base: 63/100
Evidence Intelligence™

Evidence Summary

A structured summary of where the evidence is strongest, mixed, or still emerging.

Executive Summary

Diabetes Distress evidence appears to center on Hybrid closed-loop system.

Among 40 indexed studies and 45 interventions, the strongest signals are summarized from the available evidence. Hybrid closed-loop system appears to be one of the clearer current evidence signals.

  • Evidence is consistently positive across multiple studies.
  • Some evidence is positive, but results are not consistent across all studies.
  • Early findings are encouraging, but stronger trials are needed.
Caution

This summary reflects the currently indexed evidence and should not be interpreted as treatment advice.

Key Finding

Evidence is consistently positive across multiple studies.

Interventions with strongest consistent evidence

Strongest consistent evidence

Why it matters

Consistent positive findings are easier to interpret than isolated or mixed results.

Interpretation

Hybrid closed-loop system appears to have a consistent beneficial signal in the indexed evidence.

View supporting studies
Evidence basis: 1 evidence pair - 5 studies

Why this appears here

Strong evidenceGenerally consistentPositive effect signalMultiple RCTs
Hybrid closed-loop system
5 studies
EvidenceScore™
83/100
ConsistencyScore™
56/100

Evidence Snapshot

40
Studies
45
Interventions
3
Outcomes
1
Strong evidence signals
0
Mixed evidence areas

Key Findings

Key patterns and insights identified across the research landscape

Moderate positive signal

Hybrid closed-loop system may improve Diabetes distress scores

Hybrid closed-loop system → Diabetes distress scores

Across 5 studies, Hybrid closed-loop system shows a moderate positive signal for Diabetes distress scores.

5 studies
EvidenceScore™: 83.44615384615385/100
View supporting studies
Neutral signal

Insulin therapy shows limited or neutral effect on Diabetes distress scores

Insulin therapy → Diabetes distress scores

Across 2 studies, Insulin therapy shows a consistent neutral signal for Diabetes distress scores.

2 studies
EvidenceScore™: 69/100
View supporting studies
Strong positive signal

Calorie restriction shows strong evidence for improving Reduction in child-reported diabetes distress as measured by the PAID score

Calorie restriction → Reduction in child-reported diabetes distress as measured by the PAID score

Across 1 study, Calorie restriction shows a strong positive signal for Reduction in child-reported diabetes distress as measured by the PAID score.

1 studies
EvidenceScore™: 59/100
View supporting studies
Strong positive signal

mHealth diabetes support intervention shows strong evidence for improving Reduction in child-reported diabetes distress as measured by the PAID score

mHealth diabetes support intervention → Reduction in child-reported diabetes distress as measured by the PAID score

Across 1 study, mHealth diabetes support intervention shows a strong positive signal for Reduction in child-reported diabetes distress as measured by the PAID score.

1 studies
EvidenceScore™: 59/100
View supporting studies
Strong positive signal

Time-Restricted Eating (TRE) shows strong evidence for improving Reduction in child-reported diabetes distress as measured by the PAID score

Time-Restricted Eating (TRE) → Reduction in child-reported diabetes distress as measured by the PAID score

Across 1 study, Time-Restricted Eating (TRE) shows a strong positive signal for Reduction in child-reported diabetes distress as measured by the PAID score.

1 studies
EvidenceScore™: 59/100
View supporting studies

Supporting Evidence

Mixed or conflicting evidence

Some evidence is positive, but results are not consistent across all studies.

Areas where results are mixed

Why it matters

Mixed results suggest effects may depend on population, comparator, duration, or study design.

Interpretation

Hybrid closed-loop system is mixed in the currently indexed evidence.

Caution

Some supporting studies reported neutral, negative, or mixed findings.

Top entities

Hybrid closed-loop system
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)
Hybrid closed-loop system
5 studies
EvidenceScore™
83/100
ConsistencyScore™
56/100

Why this appears here

Mixed Or Conflicting ResultsPositive Signal PresentNeutral Results Present
Evidence basis: 5 evidence pairs - 9 studies
Promising but understudied

Early findings are encouraging, but stronger trials are needed.

Promising areas needing more evidence

Why it matters

Promising signals can guide further review, but they should not be treated as settled evidence.

Interpretation

Calorie restriction may have a beneficial signal, but the evidence base is still developing.

Caution

Current support is limited by study volume, RCT depth, or evidence strength.

Top entities

Calorie restriction
Combined Yoga and Gastro-Hepatic Pack (CYG)
Calorie restriction
1 study
EvidenceScore™
59/100
ConsistencyScore™
100/100

Why this appears here

Positive effect signalLimited study volumeFew randomized trialsEmerging Or Limited Strength
Evidence basis: 5 evidence pairs - 5 studies

Explore the Evidence

The sections below provide the complete evidence questions, supporting relationships, and underlying studies behind the summary above.

Questions Answered by the Evidence

Which interventions have evidence for diabetes distress?

Hybrid closed-loop system, Insulin therapy, and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) are among the most studied approaches for diabetes distress.

Emerging Evidence · Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence. · 40 studies · 39 RCTs

View top evidence signals ↓
  1. Hybrid closed-loop system · Strong · 5 studies
  2. Insulin therapy · Moderate · 2 studies
  3. Calorie restriction · Emerging · 1 study

Hybrid closed-loop system vs Insulin therapy for diabetes distress?

Hybrid closed-loop system and Insulin therapy have available evidence for diabetes distress, but the comparison requires review of the underlying studies.

Strong Evidence · Results are generally consistent across studies. · 5 studies · 5 RCTs

View top evidence signals ↓
  1. Hybrid closed-loop system · Strong · 5 studies
  2. Insulin therapy · Moderate · 2 studies

Overall Evidence Signals

Among 40 indexed studies and 45 interventions, the strongest signals are summarized from the available evidence. Hybrid closed-loop system appears to be one of the clearer current evidence signals.

  • Evidence is consistently positive across multiple studies.
  • Some evidence is positive, but results are not consistent across all studies.
  • Early findings are encouraging, but stronger trials are needed.

Evidence Relationships

Explore the intervention-outcome relationships with the strongest supporting evidence for Diabetes Distress.

1 strong relationship, ranked by available evidence

Select any relationship to review its supporting studies.

Evidence Tracker

Track Diabetes Distress evidence

Save this evidence topic and revisit it as new studies are added.