- EvidenceScore™
- Strong
- Score 79 · Based on 4 studies
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 100
- consistent
Adjunctive therapy improves periodontal outcomes in diabetes patients
Last updated July 22, 2026
Key finding
BOP decreased significantly from baseline (8.08 ± 5.09 for SRP, p < 0.001; 4.21 ± 3.85 for SRP + aPDT, p < 0.001).
This study evaluated the effects of adjunctive periodontal therapy with Indocyanine Green irradiation in patients with Type II diabetes and periodontitis. Significant improvements were observed in clinical outcomes.
Quick read
Study at a glance
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
What this paper says
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated the effects of adjunctive periodontal therapy with Indocyanine Green irradiation in patients with Type II diabetes and periodontitis. Significant improvements were observed in clinical outcomes.
Clinical relevance
These findings are significant as they suggest that incorporating advanced therapies like Indocyanine Green irradiation could enhance periodontal treatment outcomes for patients with Type II diabetes. Improved periodontal health may lead to better overall diabetes management, reducing complications associated with both conditions.
Keep in mind
The study did not include a long-term follow-up to assess sustained effects. Sample size and demographic characteristics may limit generalizability. The study did not evaluate potential confounding factors influencing outcomes.
Published in
Journal Reference
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Irina-Georgeta S, Maria-Alexandra M, Ionut L, et al. Effects of Adjunctive Periodontal Therapy with Indocyanine Green Irradiation in Patients with Type II Diabetes and Periodontitis. Diagnostics. 2022;12(7):1614. doi:10.3390/diagnostics12071614
Main Effects
Bleeding on Probing Index decreased significantly (SRP: 8.08 ± 5.09 to 4.21 ± 3.85, p < 0.001)
Probing Depth decreased significantly (SRP: 4.10 ± 0.22 mm to 3.56 ± 0.19 mm, p < 0.001)
Clinical Attachment Level decreased significantly (SRP: 3.15 ± 0.17 mm to 2.58 ± 0.19 mm, p < 0.001)
Glycated Hemoglobin A1c decreased significantly (SRP: 6.28 ± 0.24 to 6.262 ± 0.040, p < 0.001)
Evidence network
How this study fits
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
Evidence Context
This study contributes evidence to SRP + OHI and Bleeding on probing, Clinical attachment level, HbA1c, and 2 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
SRP + OHI
Primary outcomes
- Bleeding on probing
- Clinical attachment level
- HbA1c
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Evidence relationships
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
Why this study matters
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
1
Related topics
5
Evidence pairs
310
Related studies
Why it is useful
- Contributes to 5 evidence relationships
- Includes primary outcome data
- Linked to 1 direct semantic evidence topic
Topic contributions
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker
Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Primary evidence
Evidence topic
HbA1c Reduction
matched_outcome
Core evidence
Study findings
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
- EvidenceScore™
- 84
- Strong
- ImpactScore™
- 83
- Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 67
- generally_consistent
- EvidenceScore™
- Strong
- Score 79 · Based on 4 studies
- ImpactScore™
- 63
- Slightly Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 35
- mixed
- EvidenceScore™
- 83
- Strong
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 100
- consistent
- EvidenceScore™
- Strong
- Score 79 · Based on 4 studies
- ImpactScore™
- 75
- Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 35
- mixed
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Suggest
- Bleeding on Probing decreased by 63.68% with significant p-value.
- Probing Depth reduced by 1.4 mm, indicating improved periodontal health.
- Glycated Hemoglobin A1c decreased by 0.26%, suggesting better diabetes control.
Who this applies to
- Adults diagnosed with Type II diabetes.
- Patients suffering from periodontitis.
Keep in Mind
- Results may not be applicable to non-diabetic populations.
- Further studies are needed to confirm long-term benefits.
- The effectiveness of aPDT compared to other adjunctive therapies was not assessed.
Between the Lines
- The study did not include a long-term follow-up to assess sustained effects.
- Sample size and demographic characteristics may limit generalizability.
- The study did not evaluate potential confounding factors influencing outcomes.
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Connected Evidence
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on SRP + OHI and Clinical attachment level, SRP + OHI and Periodontal probing depth.
Related evidence relationships
Explore in Evidence ExplorerThis study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
SRP + OHI → Clinical attachment level
Procedures
- EvidenceScore™
- 84
- Strong
- ImpactScore™
- 83
- Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 67
- generally_consistent
SRP + OHI → Periodontal probing depth
Procedures
- EvidenceScore™
- 83
- Strong
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 100
- consistent
Included in these evidence collections
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
Periodontal probing depth Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Periodontal probing depth
Measures Periodontal probing depth as a key outcome.
Clinical attachment level Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Clinical attachment level
Measures Clinical attachment level as a key outcome.
SRP + OHI Evidence Hub
All studies on SRP + OHI
Contributes to SRP + OHI evidence base.
Explore more in Evidence Explorer
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
All studies on SRP + OHI and Clinical attachment level
6 results
All studies on SRP + OHI and Periodontal probing depth
7 results
All studies on SRP + OHI
6 results
All studies measuring Clinical attachment level
6 results
All studies measuring Periodontal probing depth
7 results
Questions answered by this study
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Does SRP + OHI improve clinical attachment level?
SRP + OHI may improve Clinical attachment level.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Clinical attachment level
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 83.6 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does SRP + OHI improve periodontal probing depth?
SRP + OHI appears to improve Periodontal probing depth.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Periodontal probing depth
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 83.5 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does SRP + OHI improve bleeding on probing?
SRP + OHI appears to improve Bleeding on probing.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Bleeding on probing
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 79.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does SRP + OHI improve plaque index (pi)?
SRP + OHI may improve Plaque Index (PI).
ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Plaque Index (PI)
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 79.0 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Mixed | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Population details are unavailable.
Next steps
Continue your research
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Explore in Evidence Explorer
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Related research
Read related research summaries.
No ads. No tracking.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.
