- EvidenceScore™
- 84
- Strong
- ImpactScore™
- 83
- Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 67
- generally_consistent
Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy improves periodontal health in diabetes.
Last updated July 22, 2026
Key finding
Reduction of probing depth after 3 months (0.38 mm - p<0.05)
This study evaluated the effects of adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) on periodontal health in patients with type 1 diabetes. It found significant reductions in probing depth and TNF-α levels.
Quick read
Study at a glance
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
What this paper says
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated the effects of adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) on periodontal health in patients with type 1 diabetes. It found significant reductions in probing depth and TNF-α levels.
Clinical relevance
Improving periodontal health is crucial for patients with type 1 diabetes, as they are at higher risk for periodontal disease. The findings suggest that incorporating aPDT into standard treatment could enhance outcomes, potentially leading to better overall health and reduced complications related to diabetes.
Keep in mind
Unclear effectiveness for some outcomes Limited generalizability due to specific population characteristics No significant difference in clinical attachment reduction between treatments
Published in
Journal Reference
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Paula DOC, Isabela RG, Sebastião LAG, et al. Adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy improves periodontal health in patients with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2024;32:e20240258. doi:10.1590/1678-7757-2024-0258
Main Effects
Significant reduction of probing depth by 0.38 mm after 3 months (p<0.05)
Significant reduction of probing depth by 0.66 mm after 6 months (p<0.05)
Significant reduction of TNF-α in crevicular fluid in aPDT group (p<0.05)
Evidence network
How this study fits
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
Evidence Context
This study contributes evidence to SRP + OHI and Clinical attachment level, Composite endpoint achievement, Periodontal probing depth, and 1 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
SRP + OHI
Primary outcomes
- Clinical attachment level
- Composite endpoint achievement
- Periodontal probing depth
Primary intervention
Evidence relationships
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
Why this study matters
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
0
Related topics
4
Evidence pairs
0
Related studies
Why it is useful
- Contributes to 4 evidence relationships
- Includes primary outcome data
- Linked to 0 direct semantic evidence topics
Core evidence
Study findings
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Composite endpoint achievement
SRP + OHI → Composite endpoint achievement
SRP + OHI → Composite endpoint achievement
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
- EvidenceScore™
- 83
- Strong
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 100
- consistent
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Suggest
- Probing depth reduced by 0.38 mm after 3 months and 0.66 mm after 6 months.
- TNF-α levels significantly decreased in both aPDT groups.
- Clinical endpoint achievement was similar across treatment groups.
Who this applies to
- Patients with type 1 diabetes
- Individuals undergoing periodontal treatment
Keep in Mind
- Results may not apply to patients without diabetes.
- Further research needed to confirm long-term benefits.
- Effectiveness of aPDT remains unclear for some outcomes.
Between the Lines
- Unclear effectiveness for some outcomes
- Limited generalizability due to specific population characteristics
- No significant difference in clinical attachment reduction between treatments
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Connected Evidence
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on SRP + OHI and Clinical attachment level, SRP + OHI and Periodontal probing depth.
Related evidence relationships
Explore in Evidence ExplorerThis study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
SRP + OHI → Clinical attachment level
Procedures
- EvidenceScore™
- 84
- Strong
- ImpactScore™
- 83
- Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 67
- generally_consistent
SRP + OHI → Periodontal probing depth
Procedures
- EvidenceScore™
- 83
- Strong
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 100
- consistent
Included in these evidence collections
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
Periodontal probing depth Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Periodontal probing depth
Measures Periodontal probing depth as a key outcome.
Clinical attachment level Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Clinical attachment level
Measures Clinical attachment level as a key outcome.
SRP + OHI Evidence Hub
All studies on SRP + OHI
Contributes to SRP + OHI evidence base.
Recent Diabetes Research
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Explore more in Evidence Explorer
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
All studies on SRP + OHI and Clinical attachment level
6 results
All studies on SRP + OHI and Periodontal probing depth
7 results
All studies on SRP + OHI
6 results
All studies measuring Clinical attachment level
6 results
All studies measuring Periodontal probing depth
7 results
Questions answered by this study
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Does SRP + OHI improve clinical attachment level?
SRP + OHI may improve Clinical attachment level.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Clinical attachment level
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 83.6 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does SRP + OHI improve periodontal probing depth?
SRP + OHI appears to improve Periodontal probing depth.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Periodontal probing depth
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 83.5 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does SRP + OHI improve tnf-α levels?
SRP + OHI appears to improve TNF-α levels.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
TNF-α levels
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Consistency cannot yet be determined.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does SRP + OHI improve composite endpoint achievement?
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of SRP + OHI for Composite endpoint achievement.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Composite endpoint achievement
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Consistency cannot yet be determined.
- Population details are unavailable.
Next steps
Continue your research
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Explore in Evidence Explorer
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Related research
Read related research summaries.
No ads. No tracking.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.
