Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Bedtime snacks worsen nighttime blood sugar control in young children

Last updated September 9, 2026

Key finding

TIR was 34.7% for milk, significantly lower than control (75.5%) (p < 0.001).

This study examined the effects of bedtime snacking on nocturnal glycemia in young children with type 1 diabetes, finding that all snacks impaired time in range compared to no snack.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Extended (5–20+ y)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study examined the effects of bedtime snacking on nocturnal glycemia in young children with type 1 diabetes, finding that all snacks impaired time in range compared to no snack.

Clinical relevance

These findings are crucial for managing type 1 diabetes in children, as they suggest that bedtime snacking can lead to poorer blood sugar control during the night. Clinicians and caregivers should consider these results when advising on dietary habits for children with diabetes, as maintaining optimal glycemic control is vital for long-term health.

Keep in mind

The study included a limited sample size, which may affect generalizability. Only specific types of snacks were tested, limiting broader dietary conclusions. The study did not assess long-term effects of bedtime snacking on glycemic control.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Tu&#287;ba G, Ka&#287;an EK, G&#252;l YM, et al. Bedtime snacking in young children with type 1 diabetes impairs nocturnal glycemia. Nutrition & Diabetes. 2025;15:49. doi:10.1038/s41387-025-00392-9

Main Effects

Time in range (TIR) was 34.7% for milk, significantly lower than control (75.5%) (p < 0.001).

Time in range (TIR) was 38.7% for yoghurt, significantly lower than control (75.5%) (p < 0.001).

Time in range (TIR) was 45.9% for kefir, significantly lower than control (75.5%) (p < 0.001).

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Bedtime snack (kefir), Bedtime snack (milk), Bedtime snack (yoghurt), and 1 more and Hyperglycemia events, Hypoglycemia events, Time below range, and 1 more.

Primary intervention

Bedtime snack (kefir)

Primary outcomes

  • Hyperglycemia events
  • Hypoglycemia events
  • Time below range

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

16
Evidence pairs
16
Relationships
2
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 68

2

Related topics

16

Evidence pairs

581

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 16 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 2 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker

Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Primary evidence

Evidence topic

CGM Time in Range

matched_outcome

Related evidence

Evidence topic

Glycemic Control

Save evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Hyperglycemia events

Bedtime snack (kefir) → Hyperglycemia events

Bedtime snack (kefir) → Hyperglycemia events

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Hypoglycemia events

Bedtime snack (kefir) → Hypoglycemia events

Bedtime snack (kefir) → Hypoglycemia events

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
25
Negative
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Time below range

Bedtime snack (kefir) → Time below range

Bedtime snack (kefir) → Time below range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Time in range

Bedtime snack (kefir) → Time in range

Bedtime snack (kefir) → Time in range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
25
Negative
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Hyperglycemia events

Bedtime snack (milk) → Hyperglycemia events

Bedtime snack (milk) → Hyperglycemia events

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Hypoglycemia events

Bedtime snack (milk) → Hypoglycemia events

Bedtime snack (milk) → Hypoglycemia events

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
25
Negative
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Time below range

Bedtime snack (milk) → Time below range

Bedtime snack (milk) → Time below range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Time in range

Bedtime snack (milk) → Time in range

Bedtime snack (milk) → Time in range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
25
Negative
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Hyperglycemia events

Bedtime snack (yoghurt) → Hyperglycemia events

Bedtime snack (yoghurt) → Hyperglycemia events

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Hypoglycemia events

Bedtime snack (yoghurt) → Hypoglycemia events

Bedtime snack (yoghurt) → Hypoglycemia events

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
25
Negative
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Time below range

Bedtime snack (yoghurt) → Time below range

Bedtime snack (yoghurt) → Time below range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Time in range

Bedtime snack (yoghurt) → Time in range

Bedtime snack (yoghurt) → Time in range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
25
Negative
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Hyperglycemia events

Control (no snack) → Hyperglycemia events

Control (no snack) → Hyperglycemia events

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Hypoglycemia events

Control (no snack) → Hypoglycemia events

Control (no snack) → Hypoglycemia events

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
25
Negative
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Time below range

Control (no snack) → Time below range

Control (no snack) → Time below range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Time in range

Control (no snack) → Time in range

Control (no snack) → Time in range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • All snack types resulted in significantly lower TIR compared to control (p < 0.001).
  • Hyperglycemia events led to 13 days being terminated due to bedtime snacks.
  • TBR did not differ by group, indicating no increased risk of low blood sugar.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Young children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes.
  • Caregivers and healthcare providers managing diabetes in children.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • The findings are specific to the snacks tested and may not apply to all dietary choices.
  • Results are based on short-term observations and may not reflect long-term outcomes.
  • Variability in individual responses to snacks may exist, necessitating personalized dietary advice.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • The study included a limited sample size, which may affect generalizability.
  • Only specific types of snacks were tested, limiting broader dietary conclusions.
  • The study did not assess long-term effects of bedtime snacking on glycemic control.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Bedtime snack (kefir) and Hyperglycemia events, Bedtime snack (kefir) and Hypoglycemia.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Control (no snack) improve time in range?

Emerging Evidence

Control (no snack) appears to improve time in range.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Time in range

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does Bedtime snack (kefir) improve hyperglycemia events?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Bedtime snack (kefir) for hyperglycemia events.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Hyperglycemia events

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does Bedtime snack (kefir) improve time below range?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Bedtime snack (kefir) for time below range.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Time below range

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does Bedtime snack (milk) improve hyperglycemia events?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Bedtime snack (milk) for hyperglycemia events.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Hyperglycemia events

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.