Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Cloud platform improves algorithm testing for type 1 diabetes

Last updated July 18, 2026

Key finding

Time spent in target range increased from 51% to 52%.

This study evaluated a cloud-based platform for developing algorithms for type 1 diabetes using various artificial pancreas systems. It found slight improvements in glucose management metrics.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Short-Term (≤3 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study evaluated a cloud-based platform for developing algorithms for type 1 diabetes using various artificial pancreas systems. It found slight improvements in glucose management metrics.

Clinical relevance

These findings are significant as they suggest that while new technologies like artificial pancreas systems may offer some benefits in managing blood glucose levels, the overall impact on hypoglycemia remains uncertain. This highlights the need for further research to fully understand the effectiveness of these interventions in real-world settings.

Keep in mind

The study design was non-randomized, which may introduce bias. The sample size and demographic details were not specified. Effectiveness of interventions remains unclear due to lack of statistical significance.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Mohamed RS, Remi R, Ahmad H, Othmar M. A cloud-based platform for developing and testing algorithms for type 1 diabetes. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(12):e0243139. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243139

Main Effects

Time spent at glucose levels in target range increased from 51% to 52%.

Mean glucose decreased from 7.9 to 7.8 mmol/L.

Time spent at glucose levels in target range increased from 62% to 63%.

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Hybrid closed-loop system, Insulin therapy and Hypoglycemia events, Mean glucose from rtCGM, Time in range.

Primary intervention

Hybrid closed-loop system

Primary outcomes

  • Hypoglycemia events
  • Mean glucose from rtCGM
  • Time in range

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

6
Evidence pairs
6
Relationships
4
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 68

4

Related topics

6

Evidence pairs

486

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 6 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 4 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker

Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Primary evidence

Evidence relationship

Insulin Delivery Systems and CGM Time in Range

Related evidence

Evidence relationship

Insulin Therapies and CGM Time in Range

Save evidence

Evidence relationship

Insulin Therapies and Hypoglycemia

Save evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Hypoglycemia events

Hybrid closed-loop system → Hypoglycemia events

Hybrid closed-loop system → Hypoglycemia events

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
75
Strong
ImpactScore™
61
Slightly Positive
ConsistencyScore™
35
mixed
Supporting studies: Based on 4 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Mean glucose from rtCGM

Hybrid closed-loop system → Mean glucose from rtCGM

Hybrid closed-loop system → Mean glucose from rtCGM

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
ImpactScore™
75
Positive
ConsistencyScore™
100
consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 2 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Time in range

Hybrid closed-loop system → Time in range

Hybrid closed-loop system → Time in range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
81
Strong
ImpactScore™
83
Positive
ConsistencyScore™
86
consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 9 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Hypoglycemia events

Insulin therapy → Hypoglycemia events

Insulin therapy → Hypoglycemia events

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
ImpactScore™
75
Positive
ConsistencyScore™
35
mixed
Supporting studies: Based on 2 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Mean glucose from rtCGM

Insulin therapy → Mean glucose from rtCGM

Insulin therapy → Mean glucose from rtCGM

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
35
mixed
Supporting studies: Based on 2 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Time in range

Insulin therapy → Time in range

Insulin therapy → Time in range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
77
Strong
ImpactScore™
67
Slightly Positive
ConsistencyScore™
67
generally_consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 3 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • Time in target glucose range improved by 1%.
  • Mean glucose levels decreased by 1 mmol/L.
  • No change in the number of hypoglycemic events.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Individuals with type 1 diabetes.
  • Participants using insulin delivery systems.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • The findings may not be generalizable to all populations.
  • Further research is needed to confirm the effectiveness of the interventions.
  • The study did not assess long-term outcomes or quality of life.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • The study design was non-randomized, which may introduce bias.
  • The sample size and demographic details were not specified.
  • Effectiveness of interventions remains unclear due to lack of statistical significance.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Insulin Delivery Systems and CGM Time in Range, Insulin Therapies and CGM Time in Range.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Insulin Delivery Systems improve cgm time in range?

Strong Evidence

Insulin Delivery Systems may improve CGM Time in Range.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Time in range

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 81.2 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 18 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
18 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Insulin Therapies improve cgm time in range?

Strong Evidence

Insulin Therapies appears to improve CGM Time in Range.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Time in range

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 77.4 | weak positive | ConsistencyScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 8 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
8 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Insulin Therapies affect hypoglycemia?

Strong Evidence

Insulin Therapies may improve Hypoglycemia.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Hypoglycemia events

    EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.0 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Mixed | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 5 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
5 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Insulin Delivery Systems affect hypoglycemia?

Strong Evidence

Insulin Delivery Systems may improve Hypoglycemia.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Hypoglycemia events

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 75.3 | weak positive | ConsistencyScore™ Mixed | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 7 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
7 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.