GLP-1
Group Meeting → GLP-1
Group Meeting → GLP-1
Evidence profile
Key finding
The use of metformin increased by 5.9% after the individual AD visit.
This study evaluated the impact of academic detailing and group visits on prescribing practices for Type 2 Diabetes, finding significant increases in metformin and insulin prescriptions.
Evidence strength
Moderate confidence
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
Population
Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes
Intervention
Individual Academic Detailing Visit, Group Meeting, Control (No walking)
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Primary outcome
Metformin Prescribing
Comparator
No intervention
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated the impact of academic detailing and group visits on prescribing practices for Type 2 Diabetes, finding significant increases in metformin and insulin prescriptions.
Improving prescribing practices for Type 2 Diabetes is crucial for patient management and outcomes. The significant increases in medication prescriptions following targeted interventions suggest that educational strategies can effectively enhance clinical practice and patient care.
The study's effectiveness remains unclear due to limited data on long-term outcomes. The sample size and demographic diversity may limit generalizability. The control group did not receive any intervention, which may affect comparative results.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Harald CL, Øyvind S, Roar D, Hege SB, Olav S. Impact of Academic Detailing and Group Visits on Prescribing for Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2024;39(16):3243-3252. doi:10.1007/s11606-024-09014-z
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
Metformin prescribing increased by 5.9% after the individual AD visit (p=0.006).
Insulin prescribing increased by 19.1% after the group meeting (p=0.001).
GLP-1 analogues prescribing increased by 32.2% after the group meeting.
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Group Meeting, Individual Academic Detailing Visit and GLP-1, Insulin Prescribing, Metformin Prescribing, and 1 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Group Meeting
Primary outcomes
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
0
Related topics
8
Evidence pairs
0
Related studies
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Group Meeting → GLP-1
Group Meeting → GLP-1
Evidence profile
Group Meeting → Insulin Prescribing
Group Meeting → Insulin Prescribing
Evidence profile
Group Meeting → Metformin Prescribing
Group Meeting → Metformin Prescribing
Evidence profile
Group Meeting → Total T2D Drugs Prescribing
Group Meeting → Total T2D Drugs Prescribing
Evidence profile
Individual Academic Detailing Visit → GLP-1
Individual Academic Detailing Visit → GLP-1
Evidence profile
Individual Academic Detailing Visit → Insulin Prescribing
Individual Academic Detailing Visit → Insulin Prescribing
Evidence profile
Individual Academic Detailing Visit → Metformin Prescribing
Individual Academic Detailing Visit → Metformin Prescribing
Evidence profile
Individual Academic Detailing Visit → Total T2D Drugs Prescribing
Individual Academic Detailing Visit → Total T2D Drugs Prescribing
Evidence profile
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Group Meeting and GLP-1, Group Meeting and Insulin Prescribing.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring GLP-1
Measures GLP-1 as a key outcome.
All studies on Group Meeting
Contributes to Group Meeting evidence base.
All studies measuring Insulin Prescribing
Measures Insulin Prescribing as a key outcome.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Group Meeting appears to improve GLP-1.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
GLP-1
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 52.9 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Group Meeting appears to improve Insulin Prescribing.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Insulin Prescribing
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 52.9 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Group Meeting appears to improve Metformin Prescribing.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Metformin Prescribing
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 52.9 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Group Meeting appears to improve Total T2D Drugs Prescribing.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Total T2D Drugs Prescribing
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 52.9 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.