Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

GLP-1 and DPP-4 Inhibitors Show No Effect on Gallbladder Volume

Last updated September 12, 2026

Key finding

Liraglutide increased serum levels of deoxycholic acid in the fasting state [0.20 μmol/L (95% CI 0.027-0.376), p = 0.024].

This study investigated the effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors on gallbladder volume and bile acid profiles in type 2 diabetes patients, finding significant changes in bile acid levels with liraglutide and sitagliptin.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Medium-Term (3–12 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study investigated the effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors on gallbladder volume and bile acid profiles in type 2 diabetes patients, finding significant changes in bile acid levels with liraglutide and sitagliptin.

Clinical relevance

Understanding how these medications affect bile acid profiles is crucial for managing type 2 diabetes and may have implications for gastrointestinal health. Changes in bile acid levels can influence metabolism and the risk of complications associated with diabetes.

Keep in mind

The study did not assess long-term effects of the interventions. Sample size and demographic diversity may limit generalizability. No assessment of potential confounding factors affecting bile acid levels.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Mark MS, Lennart T, Marcel HM, et al. Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and DPP-4 Inhibitors on Gallbladder Volume and Bile Acid Profile in Type 2 Diabetes Patients. Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism. 2016;18(12):1217-1225. doi:10.1111/dom.12748

Main Effects

Liraglutide increased serum deoxycholic acid levels in the fasting state by 0.20 μmol/L (p = 0.024).

Liraglutide increased serum deoxycholic acid levels in the postprandial state with an AUC of 40.71 (p = 0.005).

Sitagliptin increased fecal levels of chenodeoxycholic acid by a ratio of 3.42 (p = 0.012).

Sitagliptin increased fecal levels of cholic acid by a ratio of 3.32 (p = 0.017).

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Liraglutide, Sitagliptin and Change in Serum IL-1β Levels, Faecal deoxycholic acid, Gallbladder fasting volume, and 4 more.

Primary intervention

Liraglutide

Primary outcomes

  • Change in Serum IL-1β Levels
  • Faecal deoxycholic acid
  • Gallbladder fasting volume

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

7
Evidence pairs
7
Relationships
3
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 68

3

Related topics

7

Evidence pairs

150

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 7 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 3 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker

Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Primary evidence

Evidence topic

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

matched_intervention

Related evidence

Evidence topic

Liraglutide

Save evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Change in Serum IL-1β Levels

Liraglutide → Change in Serum IL-1β Levels

Liraglutide → Change in Serum IL-1β Levels

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
25
Negative
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Faecal deoxycholic acid

Liraglutide → Faecal deoxycholic acid

Liraglutide → Faecal deoxycholic acid

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Gallbladder fasting volume

Liraglutide → Gallbladder fasting volume

Liraglutide → Gallbladder fasting volume

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Serum deoxycholic acid levels (postprandial state)

Liraglutide → Serum deoxycholic acid levels (postprandial state)

Liraglutide → Serum deoxycholic acid levels (postprandial state)

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
25
Negative
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Faecal chenodeoxycholic acid

Sitagliptin → Faecal chenodeoxycholic acid

Sitagliptin → Faecal chenodeoxycholic acid

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Faecal cholic acid

Sitagliptin → Faecal cholic acid

Sitagliptin → Faecal cholic acid

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Faecal ursodeoxycholic acid

Sitagliptin → Faecal ursodeoxycholic acid

Sitagliptin → Faecal ursodeoxycholic acid

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • Liraglutide increased fasting serum deoxycholic acid levels significantly (p = 0.024).
  • Sitagliptin significantly raised fecal levels of multiple bile acids.
  • Gallbladder volume and ejection fraction remained unchanged with both treatments.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.
  • Patients undergoing treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists or DPP-4 inhibitors.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • Results may not apply to populations outside the study sample.
  • Further research is needed to explore long-term implications of bile acid changes.
  • The study's findings are based on specific medications and may not generalize to others.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • The study did not assess long-term effects of the interventions.
  • Sample size and demographic diversity may limit generalizability.
  • No assessment of potential confounding factors affecting bile acid levels.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Faecal deoxycholic acid, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Gallbladder fasting volume.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Liraglutide improve faecal deoxycholic acid?

Emerging Evidence

Liraglutide appears to improve faecal deoxycholic acid.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Faecal deoxycholic acid

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does Sitagliptin improve faecal chenodeoxycholic acid?

Emerging Evidence

Sitagliptin appears to improve faecal chenodeoxycholic acid.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Faecal chenodeoxycholic acid

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does Sitagliptin improve faecal cholic acid?

Emerging Evidence

Sitagliptin appears to improve faecal cholic acid.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Faecal cholic acid

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does Sitagliptin improve faecal ursodeoxycholic acid?

Emerging Evidence

Sitagliptin appears to improve faecal ursodeoxycholic acid.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Faecal ursodeoxycholic acid

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.