Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Higher protein intake may improve glycemia in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Last updated September 2, 2026

Key finding

Daily protein intakes of ≥1.2 g/kg/day were associated with 6.9% greater TIR (p = 0.03).

The FLEX study aimed to identify nutritional strategies for managing glycemia in individuals with type 1 diabetes after exercise, finding that higher protein intake improved time in range and reduced time above range.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Medium-Term (3–12 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

The FLEX study aimed to identify nutritional strategies for managing glycemia in individuals with type 1 diabetes after exercise, finding that higher protein intake improved time in range and reduced time above range.

Clinical relevance

These findings are significant for individuals with type 1 diabetes as they suggest that dietary adjustments, particularly increasing protein intake, can improve glycemic control after physical activity. This could lead to better overall health outcomes and quality of life for those managing diabetes.

Keep in mind

Effectiveness of the intervention remains unclear due to limited data. The study's sample size and participant characteristics may limit generalizability. No data was provided on long-term effects of dietary changes.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Franklin RM, Abbie ES, Jamie C, et al. Nutritional strategies are needed to aid people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in managing glycemia following exercise. Nutrients. 2023;15(8):1981. doi:10.3390/nu15081981

Main Effects

Daily protein intakes of ≥1.2 g/kg/day were associated with a 6.9% increase in percent time in range (TIR, p = 0.03).

Daily protein intakes of ≥1.2 g/kg/day were associated with an 8.0% decrease in percent time above range (TAR, p = 0.02).

No association was observed between post-exercise protein intake and percent time below range (TBR).

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to FLEX behavioral self-management program and Time above range, Time below range, Time in range.

Primary intervention

FLEX behavioral self-management program

Primary outcomes

  • Time above range
  • Time below range
  • Time in range

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

3
Evidence pairs
3
Relationships
2
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 64

2

Related topics

3

Evidence pairs

642

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 3 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 2 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker

Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Primary evidence

Evidence topic

CGM Time in Range

matched_outcome

Related evidence

Evidence topic

Glycemic Control

Save evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Time above range

FLEX behavioral self-management program → Time above range

FLEX behavioral self-management program → Time above range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Time below range

FLEX behavioral self-management program → Time below range

FLEX behavioral self-management program → Time below range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Time in range

FLEX behavioral self-management program → Time in range

FLEX behavioral self-management program → Time in range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • Higher protein intake (≥1.2 g/kg/day) improved TIR by 6.9%.
  • Increased protein intake reduced TAR by 8%.
  • No significant change in TBR was observed.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Individuals with type 1 diabetes.
  • Participants engaged in regular exercise.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • Results may not apply to all individuals with diabetes due to sample characteristics.
  • Further research is needed to confirm long-term effects of protein intake.
  • The study did not assess other dietary factors that may influence glycemia.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • Effectiveness of the intervention remains unclear due to limited data.
  • The study's sample size and participant characteristics may limit generalizability.
  • No data was provided on long-term effects of dietary changes.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on FLEX behavioral self-management program and CGM Time in Range, FLEX behavioral self-management program and CGM Time in Range.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does FLEX behavioral self-management program improve time above range?

Emerging Evidence

FLEX behavioral self-management program appears to improve time above range.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Time above range

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does FLEX behavioral self-management program improve time in range?

Emerging Evidence

FLEX behavioral self-management program appears to improve time in range.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Time in range

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does FLEX behavioral self-management program improve time below range?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of FLEX behavioral self-management program for time below range.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Time below range

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.