- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Resistant starch improves insulin secretion in at-risk individuals
Last updated July 18, 2026
Key finding
First-phase insulin response (AIRg) increased by 36% compared to placebo (p = 0.009).
This study investigated the impact of resistant starch on insulin secretion in overweight individuals with insulin resistance, finding a significant increase in insulin response with resistant starch compared to placebo.
Quick read
Study at a glance
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
What this paper says
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study investigated the impact of resistant starch on insulin secretion in overweight individuals with insulin resistance, finding a significant increase in insulin response with resistant starch compared to placebo.
Clinical relevance
Improving insulin secretion is crucial for managing insulin resistance, a condition that can lead to type 2 diabetes. The findings suggest that dietary interventions like resistant starch could be a simple, effective strategy for enhancing insulin response and potentially reducing diabetes risk in overweight individuals.
Keep in mind
Limited to a specific population of overweight individuals with insulin resistance. Short duration of supplementation may not reflect long-term effects. Results may not be generalizable to other populations or dietary contexts.
Published in
Journal Reference
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Caroline LB, Leanne S, John W, Gary SF, M. DR, Daniel T. The effect of resistant starch on insulin secretion in overweight individuals with insulin resistance: a randomized crossover study. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(7):e40834. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040834
Main Effects
First-phase insulin secretion increased by 36% with HAM-RS2 compared to placebo (p = 0.009).
Insulin concentrations were significantly higher after HAM-RS2 supplementation (p = 0.009).
C-peptide concentrations were also significantly higher following HAM-RS2 compared to placebo (p = 0.016).
Evidence network
How this study fits
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
Evidence Context
This study contributes evidence to Resistant starch (HAM-RS2) and C-peptide, First-phase insulin secretion improvement, Insulin.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Resistant starch (HAM-RS2)
Primary outcomes
- C-peptide
- First-phase insulin secretion improvement
- Insulin
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Evidence relationships
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
Why this study matters
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
0
Related topics
3
Evidence pairs
0
Related studies
Why it is useful
- Contributes to 3 evidence relationships
- Includes primary outcome data
- Linked to 0 direct semantic evidence topics
Core evidence
Study findings
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
First-phase insulin secretion improvement
Resistant starch (HAM-RS2) → First-phase insulin secretion improvement
Resistant starch (HAM-RS2) → First-phase insulin secretion improvement
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Suggest
- HAM-RS2 led to a 36% increase in first-phase insulin secretion.
- Insulin and C-peptide levels were significantly higher after resistant starch compared to placebo.
- No significant changes were observed in the placebo group.
Who this applies to
- Overweight individuals with insulin resistance.
- Adults at risk of developing type 2 diabetes.
Keep in Mind
- The study's findings are based on a specific dietary intervention.
- Further research is needed to explore long-term effects and broader applicability.
- Results may vary based on individual dietary habits and metabolic responses.
Between the Lines
- Limited to a specific population of overweight individuals with insulin resistance.
- Short duration of supplementation may not reflect long-term effects.
- Results may not be generalizable to other populations or dietary contexts.
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Connected Evidence
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Resistant starch (HAM-RS2) and C-peptide, Resistant starch (HAM-RS2) and First-phase insulin secretion improvement.
Related evidence relationships
Explore in Evidence ExplorerThis study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Resistant starch (HAM-RS2) → C-peptide
Diet and Nutrition
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Resistant starch (HAM-RS2) → First-phase insulin secretion improvement
Diet and Nutrition
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Included in these evidence collections
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
C-peptide Evidence Hub
All studies measuring C-peptide
Measures C-peptide as a key outcome.
First-phase insulin secretion improvement Evidence Hub
All studies measuring First-phase insulin secretion improvement
Measures First-phase insulin secretion improvement as a key outcome.
Resistant starch (HAM-RS2) Evidence Hub
All studies on Resistant starch (HAM-RS2)
Contributes to Resistant starch (HAM-RS2) evidence base.
Explore more in Evidence Explorer
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
All studies on Resistant starch (HAM-RS2) and C-peptide
1 results
All studies on Resistant starch (HAM-RS2) and First-phase insulin secretion improvement
1 results
All studies on Resistant starch (HAM-RS2)
1 results
All studies measuring C-peptide
1 results
All studies measuring First-phase insulin secretion improvement
1 results
Questions answered by this study
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Does Resistant starch (HAM-RS2) improve c-peptide?
Resistant starch (HAM-RS2) appears to improve C-peptide.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
C-peptide
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Consistency cannot yet be determined.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Resistant starch (HAM-RS2) improve first-phase insulin secretion improvement?
Resistant starch (HAM-RS2) appears to improve First-phase insulin secretion improvement.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
First-phase insulin secretion improvement
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Consistency cannot yet be determined.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Resistant starch (HAM-RS2) improve insulin?
Resistant starch (HAM-RS2) appears to improve Insulin.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Insulin
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Consistency cannot yet be determined.
- Population details are unavailable.
Next steps
Continue your research
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Explore in Evidence Explorer
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Related research
Read related research summaries.
No ads. No tracking.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.
