Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

SMS Text Messages Improve Diabetes Distress in Teens

Last updated August 29, 2026

Key finding

Adolescents in the positive affect + education group responded to 92.5% of intervention messages.

This study evaluated a positive psychology intervention delivered via SMS for adolescents with Type 1 diabetes, showing high engagement and satisfaction rates.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Short-Term (≤3 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study evaluated a positive psychology intervention delivered via SMS for adolescents with Type 1 diabetes, showing high engagement and satisfaction rates.

Clinical relevance

This intervention highlights the potential of using technology to support mental health and education in adolescents with chronic conditions like Type 1 diabetes. High engagement and satisfaction suggest that such approaches could enhance diabetes management and overall well-being.

Keep in mind

Effectiveness of the interventions remains unclear due to lack of statistical significance. The study may not be generalizable beyond the specific population sampled. Limited information on long-term impacts of the intervention.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Lauren L, Erin B, Karishma D, Randi S, Sarah J, Sherif B. A Positive Psychology Intervention Delivered via Automated SMS Text Messages for Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting. 2023;6:e47089. doi:10.2196/47089

Main Effects

Adolescents in the positive affect + education group responded to 92.5% of SMS messages.

Caregivers engaged with 88.5% of the messages.

95% of participants reported satisfaction with the intervention and willingness to participate again.

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Positive affect + education intervention, mHealth dietary education intervention and Average response rate to SMS text messages by adolescents, Caregiver Response Rate to SMS Text Messages, Parent satisfaction score regarding diabetes intervention, and 1 more.

Primary intervention

Positive affect + education intervention

Primary outcomes

  • Average response rate to SMS text messages by adolescents
  • Caregiver Response Rate to SMS Text Messages
  • Parent satisfaction score regarding diabetes intervention

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

4
Evidence pairs
4
Relationships
0
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 50

0

Related topics

4

Evidence pairs

0

Related studies

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 4 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 0 direct semantic evidence topics

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Satisfaction with the education intervention

mHealth dietary education intervention → Satisfaction with the education intervention

mHealth dietary education intervention → Satisfaction with the education intervention

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Average response rate to SMS text messages by adolescents

Positive affect + education intervention → Average response rate to SMS text messages by adolescents

Positive affect + education intervention → Average response rate to SMS text messages by adolescents

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Caregiver Response Rate to SMS Text Messages

Positive affect + education intervention → Caregiver Response Rate to SMS Text Messages

Positive affect + education intervention → Caregiver Response Rate to SMS Text Messages

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Parent satisfaction score regarding diabetes intervention

Positive affect + education intervention → Parent satisfaction score regarding diabetes intervention

Positive affect + education intervention → Parent satisfaction score regarding diabetes intervention

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • 92.5% engagement rate among adolescents with SMS messages.
  • 88.5% caregiver engagement with intervention messages.
  • 95% satisfaction rate among participants indicating willingness to participate again.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Adolescents aged 12-18 with Type 1 diabetes.
  • Caregivers of adolescents with Type 1 diabetes.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • The study's findings may not apply to younger children or adults.
  • Results are based on self-reported satisfaction and engagement, which may introduce bias.
  • Further research is needed to assess long-term effectiveness and broader applicability.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • Effectiveness of the interventions remains unclear due to lack of statistical significance.
  • The study may not be generalizable beyond the specific population sampled.
  • Limited information on long-term impacts of the intervention.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on mHealth dietary education intervention and Satisfaction with the education intervention, Positive affect + education intervention and Caregiver Response Rate to SMS Text Messages.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Included in these evidence collections

Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.

Explore more in Evidence Explorer

Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Positive affect + education intervention improve average response rate to sms text messages by adolescents?

Emerging Evidence

Positive affect + education intervention appears to improve Average response rate to SMS text messages by adolescents.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Average response rate to SMS text messages by adolescents

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Aug 2026

Does Positive affect + education intervention improve caregiver response rate to sms text messages?

Emerging Evidence

Positive affect + education intervention appears to improve Caregiver Response Rate to SMS Text Messages.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Caregiver Response Rate to SMS Text Messages

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Aug 2026

Does Positive affect + education intervention improve parent satisfaction score regarding diabetes intervention?

Emerging Evidence

Positive affect + education intervention appears to improve Parent satisfaction score regarding diabetes intervention.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Parent satisfaction score regarding diabetes intervention

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Aug 2026

Does mHealth dietary education intervention improve satisfaction with the education intervention?

Emerging Evidence

mHealth dietary education intervention appears to improve Satisfaction with the education intervention.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Satisfaction with the education intervention

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Aug 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.