- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
SRP with Laser Therapy Improves TNF-α Levels in Diabetic Patients
Last updated July 22, 2026
Key finding
PI decreased significantly from baseline to 8 weeks (mean difference 1.04, p < 0.001).
This study evaluated the impact of Scaling and Root Planing with and without Low Level Laser Therapy on salivary TNF-α levels in patients with periodontitis and type 2 diabetes, finding significant reductions in several clinical parameters.
Quick read
Study at a glance
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
What this paper says
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated the impact of Scaling and Root Planing with and without Low Level Laser Therapy on salivary TNF-α levels in patients with periodontitis and type 2 diabetes, finding significant reductions in several clinical parameters.
Clinical relevance
These findings are clinically significant as they suggest that integrating Low Level Laser Therapy with standard periodontal treatment may enhance outcomes for patients with both periodontitis and type 2 diabetes, potentially leading to better management of their overall health and reduced inflammation.
Keep in mind
Unclear effectiveness of LLLT compared to SRP alone Limited generalizability due to specific population characteristics Potential confounding factors not controlled in the study
Published in
Journal Reference
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Praneetha P, Vijay KC, Sumanth G. Effect of Scaling and Root Planing with Adjunctive Low Level Laser Therapy on Salivary TNF-α Levels in Patients with Periodontitis and Type 2 Diabetes. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2022;26(3):236-244. doi:10.4103/jisp.jisp_150_21
Main Effects
Plaque Index decreased by 1.04 units (p < 0.001)
Bleeding Index decreased by 1.46 units (p < 0.001)
Salivary TNF-α levels decreased by 5.18 pg/mL (p < 0.001)
Evidence network
How this study fits
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
Evidence Context
This study contributes evidence to Photobiomodulation therapy, SRP + OHI and Blood glucose, TNF-α levels, Change in Bleeding Index from Baseline to 8 Weeks, and 3 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Photobiomodulation therapy
Primary outcomes
- Blood glucose
- TNF-α levels
- Change in Bleeding Index from Baseline to 8 Weeks
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Evidence relationships
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
Why this study matters
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
1
Related topics
6
Evidence pairs
245
Related studies
Why it is useful
- Contributes to 6 evidence relationships
- Includes primary outcome data
- Linked to 1 direct semantic evidence topic
Topic contributions
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker
Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Primary evidence
Evidence topic
Glycemic Control
matched_outcome
Core evidence
Study findings
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Change in Bleeding Index from Baseline to 8 Weeks
SRP + OHI → Change in Bleeding Index from Baseline to 8 Weeks
SRP + OHI → Change in Bleeding Index from Baseline to 8 Weeks
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
- EvidenceScore™
- 84
- Strong
- ImpactScore™
- 83
- Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 67
- generally_consistent
- EvidenceScore™
- 83
- Strong
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 100
- consistent
- EvidenceScore™
- Strong
- Score 79 · Based on 4 studies
- ImpactScore™
- 75
- Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 35
- mixed
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Suggest
- Salivary TNF-α levels reduced significantly by 5.18 pg/mL
- Probing Depth decreased significantly by 3.19 mm
- Random Blood Sugar levels decreased significantly by 2.79 units
Who this applies to
- Adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes
- Patients suffering from periodontitis
Keep in Mind
- Results may not apply to populations outside the study group
- Further research needed to confirm long-term effects
- Study design may limit the applicability of findings
Between the Lines
- Unclear effectiveness of LLLT compared to SRP alone
- Limited generalizability due to specific population characteristics
- Potential confounding factors not controlled in the study
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Connected Evidence
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on SRP + OHI and Clinical attachment level, SRP + OHI and Periodontal probing depth.
Related evidence relationships
Explore in Evidence ExplorerThis study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
SRP + OHI → Clinical attachment level
Procedures
- EvidenceScore™
- 84
- Strong
- ImpactScore™
- 83
- Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 67
- generally_consistent
SRP + OHI → Periodontal probing depth
Procedures
- EvidenceScore™
- 83
- Strong
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 100
- consistent
Included in these evidence collections
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
Periodontal probing depth Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Periodontal probing depth
Measures Periodontal probing depth as a key outcome.
Clinical attachment level Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Clinical attachment level
Measures Clinical attachment level as a key outcome.
SRP + OHI Evidence Hub
All studies on SRP + OHI
Contributes to SRP + OHI evidence base.
Explore more in Evidence Explorer
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
All studies on SRP + OHI and Clinical attachment level
6 results
All studies on SRP + OHI and Periodontal probing depth
7 results
All studies on SRP + OHI
6 results
All studies measuring Clinical attachment level
6 results
All studies measuring Periodontal probing depth
7 results
Questions answered by this study
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Does SRP + OHI improve clinical attachment level?
SRP + OHI may improve Clinical attachment level.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Clinical attachment level
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 83.6 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does SRP + OHI improve periodontal probing depth?
SRP + OHI appears to improve Periodontal probing depth.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Periodontal probing depth
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 83.5 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does SRP + OHI improve plaque index (pi)?
SRP + OHI may improve Plaque Index (PI).
ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Plaque Index (PI)
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 79.0 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Mixed | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Photobiomodulation therapy improve blood glucose?
Photobiomodulation therapy appears to improve Blood glucose.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Blood glucose
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Consistency cannot yet be determined.
- Population details are unavailable.
Next steps
Continue your research
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Explore in Evidence Explorer
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Related research
Read related research summaries.
No ads. No tracking.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.
