Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Structured lifestyle intervention improves eating self-efficacy in diabetes.

Last updated July 18, 2026

Key finding

WEL scores improved in both the tDNA groups with significantly higher improvement in the tDNA-MI group.

A structured lifestyle intervention improved eating self-efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes, particularly through the Transcultural Diabetes Nutrition Algorithm with Motivational Interviewing.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Medium-Term (3–12 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

A structured lifestyle intervention improved eating self-efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes, particularly through the Transcultural Diabetes Nutrition Algorithm with Motivational Interviewing.

Clinical relevance

Improving eating self-efficacy is crucial for patients with type 2 diabetes, as it can lead to better dietary choices and management of their condition. The findings suggest that targeted interventions can enhance patients' confidence in managing their eating behaviors, potentially leading to improved health outcomes.

Keep in mind

The study did not include a diverse population, limiting generalizability. Effectiveness of other interventions was unclear due to lack of significant data. Sample size and follow-up duration may affect the robustness of findings.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Harvinder KGS, Winnie SSC, Osama H, et al. Eating self-efficacy improved in patients with type 2 diabetes following a structured lifestyle intervention. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(11):e0242487. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242487

Main Effects

The tDNA-MI group showed a significant increase in WEL scores, with a change of 25.4 ± 2.1 at 6 months.

At 12 months, the tDNA-MI group maintained an increase in WEL scores, showing a change of 28.9 ± 3.1.

The tDNA-CC group had a smaller increase in WEL scores, with a change of 12.9 ± 2.8 at 6 months.

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Conventional Counseling (tDNA-CC), Motivational Interviewing (tDNA-MI), Transcultural Diabetes Nutrition Algorithm (tDNA), and 1 more and Change in WEL Scores at 6 Months for tDNA-CC, WEL Score Change at 12 Months for tDNA-CC, Change in WEL Scores at 6 Months, and 5 more.

Primary intervention

Conventional Counseling (tDNA-CC)

Primary outcomes

  • Change in WEL Scores at 6 Months for tDNA-CC
  • WEL Score Change at 12 Months for tDNA-CC
  • Change in WEL Scores at 6 Months

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

8
Evidence pairs
8
Relationships
0
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 50

0

Related topics

8

Evidence pairs

0

Related studies

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 8 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 0 direct semantic evidence topics

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Change in WEL Scores at 6 Months for tDNA-CC

Conventional Counseling (tDNA-CC) → Change in WEL Scores at 6 Months for tDNA-CC

Conventional Counseling (tDNA-CC) → Change in WEL Scores at 6 Months for tDNA-CC

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

WEL Score Change at 12 Months for tDNA-CC

Conventional Counseling (tDNA-CC) → WEL Score Change at 12 Months for tDNA-CC

Conventional Counseling (tDNA-CC) → WEL Score Change at 12 Months for tDNA-CC

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Change in WEL scores at 12 months for tDNA-MI

Motivational Interviewing (tDNA-MI) → Change in WEL scores at 12 months for tDNA-MI

Motivational Interviewing (tDNA-MI) → Change in WEL scores at 12 months for tDNA-MI

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Change in WEL Scores at 6 Months

Motivational Interviewing (tDNA-MI) → Change in WEL Scores at 6 Months

Motivational Interviewing (tDNA-MI) → Change in WEL Scores at 6 Months

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
25
Negative
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Change in Weight Efficacy Lifestyle (WEL) Score

Transcultural Diabetes Nutrition Algorithm (tDNA) → Change in Weight Efficacy Lifestyle (WEL) Score

Transcultural Diabetes Nutrition Algorithm (tDNA) → Change in Weight Efficacy Lifestyle (WEL) Score

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Change in WEL Scores at 12 Months

Transcultural Diabetes Nutrition Algorithm (tDNA) → Change in WEL Scores at 12 Months

Transcultural Diabetes Nutrition Algorithm (tDNA) → Change in WEL Scores at 12 Months

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Change in WEL Scores at 12 Months for UC

Usual care → Change in WEL Scores at 12 Months for UC

Usual care → Change in WEL Scores at 12 Months for UC

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Change in WEL Scores at 6 Months for UC

Usual care → Change in WEL Scores at 6 Months for UC

Usual care → Change in WEL Scores at 6 Months for UC

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • tDNA-MI led to a significant increase in WEL scores of 25.4 at 6 months.
  • tDNA-MI maintained improvements with a score change of 28.9 at 12 months.
  • Usual Care resulted in a decrease in WEL scores by -6.9 at 6 months.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.
  • Patients seeking structured lifestyle interventions for dietary management.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • Results may not apply to populations outside the study's demographic.
  • Further research is needed to confirm findings across diverse groups.
  • The study's design may limit the applicability of results to real-world settings.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • The study did not include a diverse population, limiting generalizability.
  • Effectiveness of other interventions was unclear due to lack of significant data.
  • Sample size and follow-up duration may affect the robustness of findings.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Conventional Counseling (tDNA-CC) and WEL Score Change at 12 Months for tDNA-CC, Conventional Counseling (tDNA-CC) and Change in WEL Scores at 6 Months for tDNA-CC.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Included in these evidence collections

Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.

Explore more in Evidence Explorer

Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Motivational Interviewing (tDNA-MI) improve change in wel scores at 12 months for tdna-mi?

Emerging Evidence

Motivational Interviewing (tDNA-MI) appears to improve Change in WEL scores at 12 months for tDNA-MI.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Change in WEL scores at 12 months for tDNA-MI

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Transcultural Diabetes Nutrition Algorithm (tDNA) improve change in wel scores at 12 months?

Emerging Evidence

Transcultural Diabetes Nutrition Algorithm (tDNA) appears to improve Change in WEL Scores at 12 Months.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Change in WEL Scores at 12 Months

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Transcultural Diabetes Nutrition Algorithm (tDNA) improve change in weight efficacy lifestyle (wel) score?

Emerging Evidence

Transcultural Diabetes Nutrition Algorithm (tDNA) appears to improve Change in Weight Efficacy Lifestyle (WEL) Score.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Change in Weight Efficacy Lifestyle (WEL) Score

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Conventional Counseling (tDNA-CC) improve change in wel scores at 6 months for tdna-cc?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Conventional Counseling (tDNA-CC) for Change in WEL Scores at 6 Months for tDNA-CC.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Change in WEL Scores at 6 Months for tDNA-CC

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.