Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

LISTEN intervention may reduce diabetes distress in adults

Last updated August 29, 2026

Key finding

Diabetes distress scores were lower post-intervention.

The study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of the LISTEN intervention for adults with diabetes, finding improvements in diabetes distress and participant satisfaction.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Short-Term (≤3 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

The study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of the LISTEN intervention for adults with diabetes, finding improvements in diabetes distress and participant satisfaction.

Clinical relevance

This study highlights the potential of low-intensity mental health interventions to support adults with diabetes, addressing psychological aspects that can significantly impact diabetes management and overall well-being. Improved mental health support could lead to better health outcomes and quality of life for this population.

Keep in mind

Effectiveness of the intervention remains unclear due to lack of specific effect sizes. The study was limited to a single arm, affecting generalizability. Recruitment rates may not reflect broader populations.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Edith EH, Shikha G, Jennifer H, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of LISTEN: a low-intensity mental health support intervention for adults with diabetes. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 2023;9:133. doi:10.1186/s40814-023-01367-2

Main Effects

Diabetes distress scores were lower post-intervention.

92% of participants felt the number of sessions was 'just right'.

75% felt comfortable talking with health professionals.

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to LISTEN intervention and Comfort in talking with health professionals, Diabetes distress scores, Program satisfaction, and 3 more.

Primary intervention

LISTEN intervention

Primary outcomes

  • Comfort in talking with health professionals
  • Diabetes distress scores
  • Program satisfaction

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

6
Evidence pairs
6
Relationships
3
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 68

3

Related topics

6

Evidence pairs

618

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 6 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 3 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker

Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Primary evidence

Evidence topic

CGM Time in Range

matched_outcome

Related evidence

Evidence topic

Diabetes Distress

Save evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Comfort in talking with health professionals

LISTEN intervention → Comfort in talking with health professionals

LISTEN intervention → Comfort in talking with health professionals

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Diabetes distress scores

LISTEN intervention → Diabetes distress scores

LISTEN intervention → Diabetes distress scores

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Program satisfaction

LISTEN intervention → Program satisfaction

LISTEN intervention → Program satisfaction

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Recruitment Rate

LISTEN intervention → Recruitment Rate

LISTEN intervention → Recruitment Rate

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Simple reaction time

LISTEN intervention → Simple reaction time

LISTEN intervention → Simple reaction time

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
25
Negative
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Time below range

LISTEN intervention → Time below range

LISTEN intervention → Time below range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
25
Negative
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • Diabetes distress scores decreased post-intervention.
  • 92% of participants endorsed session frequency as appropriate.
  • 75% reported comfort in discussing issues with health professionals.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Adults diagnosed with diabetes.
  • Individuals seeking low-intensity mental health support.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • Findings are based on a single-arm study, limiting broader applicability.
  • Effectiveness claims are uncertain due to unclear effect sizes.
  • Results may not generalize to all demographics of adults with diabetes.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • Effectiveness of the intervention remains unclear due to lack of specific effect sizes.
  • The study was limited to a single arm, affecting generalizability.
  • Recruitment rates may not reflect broader populations.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on LISTEN intervention and Comfort in talking with health professionals, LISTEN intervention and Diabetes Distress Measures.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does LISTEN intervention improve comfort in talking with health professionals?

Emerging Evidence

LISTEN intervention appears to improve comfort in talking with health professionals.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Comfort in talking with health professionals

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does LISTEN intervention improve diabetes distress scores?

Emerging Evidence

LISTEN intervention appears to improve diabetes distress scores.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Diabetes distress scores

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does LISTEN intervention improve program satisfaction?

Emerging Evidence

LISTEN intervention appears to improve program satisfaction.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Program satisfaction

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does LISTEN intervention improve recruitment rate?

Emerging Evidence

LISTEN intervention appears to improve recruitment rate.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Recruitment Rate

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.