Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Magnesium improves T-cell function in type 2 diabetes.

Last updated July 3, 2026

Key finding

Serum magnesium was significantly higher after treatment with magnesium than with placebo (0.76 ± 0.02 vs 0.69 ± 0.02 mmol/L, P < .001).

Magnesium supplementation compared with placebo in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Short-Term (≤3 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

Magnesium supplementation compared with placebo in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Clinical relevance

This study evaluated Magnesium supplementation compared with placebo in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Keep in mind

Limitations were not clearly described in the extracted text.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Linda CAD, Mandala A, Jeroen HFDB, Cees JT, Bastiaan EDG, Rinke S. Magnesium supplementation modulates T-cell function in type 2 diabetes patients with low magnesium levels. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2024;109(12):e2240-e2245. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgae097

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Magnesium supplement and 24-h urine magnesium excretion, C-reactive protein, Cytokine production from T-helper 2 cells, and 2 more.

Primary intervention

Magnesium supplement

Primary outcomes

  • 24-h urine magnesium excretion
  • C-reactive protein
  • Cytokine production from T-helper 2 cells

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

5
Evidence pairs
5
Relationships
1
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 59

1

Related topics

5

Evidence pairs

69

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 5 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 1 direct semantic evidence topic

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker

Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Primary evidence

Evidence relationship

Magnesium Supplements and Adipokine and Angiogenic Markers

Related evidence

Evidence relationship

Magnesium Supplements and Inflammatory Markers

Save evidence

Evidence topic

Inflammatory and Vascular Markers

Save evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

24-h urine magnesium excretion

Magnesium supplement → 24-h urine magnesium excretion

Magnesium supplement → 24-h urine magnesium excretion

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

C-reactive protein

Magnesium supplement → C-reactive protein

Magnesium supplement → C-reactive protein

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Cytokine production from T-helper 2 cells

Magnesium supplement → Cytokine production from T-helper 2 cells

Magnesium supplement → Cytokine production from T-helper 2 cells

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Interferon-γ production from CD8+ T-cells

Magnesium supplement → Interferon-γ production from CD8+ T-cells

Magnesium supplement → Interferon-γ production from CD8+ T-cells

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Serum magnesium

Magnesium supplement → Serum magnesium

Magnesium supplement → Serum magnesium

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Magnesium Supplements and 24-h urine magnesium excretion, Magnesium Supplements and Inflammatory Markers.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Magnesium Supplements improve adipokine and angiogenic markers?

Strong Evidence

Magnesium Supplements may improve Adipokine and Angiogenic Markers.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Serum magnesium

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 3 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
3 supporting studiesUpdated: Aug 2026

Does Magnesium Supplements improve inflammatory markers?

Moderate Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Magnesium Supplements for Inflammatory Markers.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    C-reactive protein

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a small number of supporting studies and should be interpreted cautiously.

Limitations

  • Only a small number of supporting studies are available.
  • Population details are unavailable.
2 supporting studiesUpdated: Aug 2026

Does Magnesium supplement improve 24-h urine magnesium excretion?

Emerging Evidence

Magnesium supplement appears to improve 24-h urine magnesium excretion.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    24-h urine magnesium excretion

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Aug 2026

Does Magnesium supplement improve cytokine production from t-helper 2 cells?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Magnesium supplement for Cytokine production from T-helper 2 cells.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Cytokine production from T-helper 2 cells

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Aug 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.