Fasting blood sugar (FBS)
Sumac supplement → Fasting blood sugar (FBS)
Sumac supplement → Fasting blood sugar (FBS)
Evidence profile
Key finding
FBS decreased significantly from 147 (122, 167) to 100 (92, 121) with p=0.002.
This study investigated the anti-diabetic effects of sumac in patients with type 2 diabetes, finding significant improvements in fasting blood sugar and HbA1C levels.
Evidence strength
Moderate confidence
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Extended (5–20+ y)
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
Population
Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes
Intervention
Sumac supplement
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Extended (5–20+ y)
Primary outcome
Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS)
Comparator
Calcium dibasic phosphate capsule
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study investigated the anti-diabetic effects of sumac in patients with type 2 diabetes, finding significant improvements in fasting blood sugar and HbA1C levels.
These findings suggest that sumac could be a beneficial dietary supplement for managing blood sugar levels in type 2 diabetes patients. As diabetes management is crucial for preventing complications, incorporating natural supplements like sumac may enhance treatment strategies.
The study did not assess long-term effects of sumac supplementation. Sample size and demographic diversity may limit generalizability. No significant changes were observed in total cholesterol, LDL, or triglycerides.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Hossein A, Soleiman M, Mohsen Y, Siamak N, Shervin A, AliSina S. The anti-diabetic effect of sumac in patients with type 2 diabetes: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine. 2025;16(3):417-423. doi:10.22088/cjim.16.3.417
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
Fasting Blood Sugar decreased significantly from 147 mg/dL to 100 mg/dL (p=0.002).
HbA1C decreased significantly from 7.74% to 6.47% (p=0.007).
HDL Cholesterol increased significantly from 46 mg/dL to 50 mg/dL (p<0.001).
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Sumac supplement and Fasting blood sugar (FBS), HDL cholesterol, HbA1c, and 3 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Sumac supplement
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
2
Related topics
6
Evidence pairs
270
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Sumac supplement → Fasting blood sugar (FBS)
Sumac supplement → Fasting blood sugar (FBS)
Evidence profile
Sumac supplement → HbA1c
Sumac supplement → HbA1c
Evidence profile
Sumac supplement → HDL cholesterol
Sumac supplement → HDL cholesterol
Evidence profile
Sumac supplement → LDL cholesterol
Sumac supplement → LDL cholesterol
Evidence profile
Sumac supplement → Total cholesterol
Sumac supplement → Total cholesterol
Evidence profile
Sumac supplement → Triglycerides
Sumac supplement → Triglycerides
Evidence profile
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Sumac supplement and Fasting Glucose, Sumac supplement and HbA1c.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring Adipokine and Angiogenic Markers
Measures Adipokine and Angiogenic Markers as a key outcome.
All studies measuring Fasting Glucose
Measures Fasting Glucose as a key outcome.
All studies measuring HbA1c
Measures HbA1c as a key outcome.
All studies on Sumac supplement
Contributes to Sumac supplement evidence base.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Sumac supplement appears to improve Fasting blood sugar (FBS).
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Fasting blood sugar (FBS)
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 52.9 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Sumac supplement appears to improve HDL cholesterol.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
HDL cholesterol
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 52.9 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Sumac supplement appears to improve HbA1c.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 52.9 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Sumac supplement for LDL cholesterol.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
LDL cholesterol
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 35.4 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.