- ImpactScore™
- 67
- Slightly Positive
- EvidenceScore™
- Strong
- Score 79 · Based on 3 studies
- ConsistencyScore™
- 67
- generally_consistent
Vitamin D does not lower diabetes risk in older adults
Last updated July 2, 2026
Key finding
There were 38 (5.0%), 31 (4.2%) and 36 (4.7%) type 2 diabetes events in the placebo, 1600 IU/day vitamin D 3 and 3200 IU/day vitamin D 3 arms, respectively (p-trend=0.73).
This study investigated the effects of vitamin D supplementation on type 2 diabetes risk in older adults, finding no significant reduction in diabetes events.
Quick read
Study at a glance
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Extended (5–20+ y)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
Plain-language summary
What this paper says
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study investigated the effects of vitamin D supplementation on type 2 diabetes risk in older adults, finding no significant reduction in diabetes events.
Clinical relevance
Understanding the role of vitamin D in diabetes prevention is crucial, especially for older adults who are at higher risk. These findings suggest that vitamin D supplementation alone may not be an effective strategy for reducing diabetes risk in this population, prompting a need for further research into alternative prevention methods.
Keep in mind
The study may have limited generalizability due to the specific population studied. The follow-up period of 24 months may not be sufficient to observe long-term effects. Effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation may vary based on individual health factors not accounted for.
Published in
Journal Reference
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Jyrki KV, Sari H, Niko K, et al. Vitamin D supplementation does not significantly reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes in older adults. Diabetologia. 2024;68(4):715-726. doi:10.1007/s00125-024-06336-9
Main Effects
No significant difference in type 2 diabetes events: 5.0% (placebo), 4.2% (1600 IU), 4.7% (3200 IU), p-trend=0.73.
No changes in plasma glucose levels during follow-up (p values ≥0.19).
No differences in BMI changes over the 24 months (p values ≥0.19).
Evidence network
How this study fits
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
Evidence Context
This study contributes evidence to Vitamin D supplementation and BMI, Blood glucose, type 2 diabetes mellitus.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Vitamin D supplementation
Primary outcomes
- BMI
- Blood glucose
- type 2 diabetes mellitus
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Evidence relationships
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
Why this study matters
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
2
Related topics
3
Evidence pairs
204
Related studies
Why it is useful
- Contributes to 3 evidence relationships
- Includes primary outcome data
- Linked to 2 direct semantic evidence topics
Topic contributions
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Core evidence
Study findings
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Moderate
- Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
- ConsistencyScore™
- 100
- consistent
type 2 diabetes mellitus
Vitamin D supplementation → type 2 diabetes mellitus
Vitamin D supplementation → type 2 diabetes mellitus
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Moderate
- Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
- ConsistencyScore™
- 100
- consistent
Unlock full evidence analysis
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Evidence Suggest
- Vitamin D supplementation did not significantly reduce diabetes incidence in older adults.
- No significant changes in blood glucose levels were observed.
- BMI changes were also not significantly different among the groups.
Who this applies to
- Older adults at risk for type 2 diabetes.
- Individuals considering vitamin D supplementation for diabetes prevention.
Keep in Mind
- Results may not apply to younger populations or those with different health conditions.
- The study's findings do not support vitamin D as a standalone intervention for diabetes prevention.
- Further research is needed to explore other potential interventions for diabetes risk reduction.
Between the Lines
- The study may have limited generalizability due to the specific population studied.
- The follow-up period of 24 months may not be sufficient to observe long-term effects.
- Effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation may vary based on individual health factors not accounted for.
Unlock Full Analysis
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Connected Evidence
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Vitamin D supplementation and Fasting Glucose, Vitamin D supplementation and Body Mass Index.
Related evidence relationships
Explore in Evidence ArchiveThis study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Vitamin D supplementation → Fasting Glucose
Supplements
- ImpactScore™
- 67
- Slightly Positive
- EvidenceScore™
- Strong
- Score 79 · Based on 3 studies
- ConsistencyScore™
- 67
- generally_consistent
Vitamin D supplementation → Body Mass Index
Supplements
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Moderate
- Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
- ConsistencyScore™
- 100
- consistent
Included in these evidence collections
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
Fasting Glucose Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Fasting Glucose
Measures Fasting Glucose as a key outcome.
Vitamin D supplementation Evidence Hub
All studies on Vitamin D supplementation
Contributes to Vitamin D supplementation evidence base.
Body Mass Index Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Body Mass Index
Measures Body Mass Index as a key outcome.
Recent Diabetes Research
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Explore more in the evidence archive
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
All studies on Vitamin D supplementation and Blood glucose
3 results
All studies on Vitamin D supplementation and BMI
2 results
All studies on Vitamin D supplementation
3 results
All studies measuring Blood glucose
3 results
All studies measuring BMI
2 results
Questions answered by this study
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Does Vitamin D supplementation improve blood glucose?
Vitamin D supplementation may improve Blood glucose.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Blood glucose
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 79.0 | weak positive | ConsistencyScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Vitamin D supplementation affect bmi?
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Vitamin D supplementation for BMI.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
BMI
EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Vitamin D supplementation improve type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Vitamin D supplementation for type 2 diabetes mellitus.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
type 2 diabetes mellitus
EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Population details are unavailable.
Next steps
Continue your research
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Evidence topics
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Explore in archive
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Related research
Read related research summaries.
No ads. No tracking.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.
