Fasting blood sugar (FBS)
Standard anti-diabetic drugs only → Fasting blood sugar (FBS)
Standard anti-diabetic drugs only → Fasting blood sugar (FBS)
Evidence profile
Key finding
No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of HbA1c (p= 0.263).
This study investigated the effects of vitamin D supplementation on glycemic control in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients. No significant differences were found between the vitamin D group and the standard anti-diabetic drugs group.
Evidence strength
Moderate confidence
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
Population
Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes
Intervention
Vitamin D supplementation, Standard anti-diabetic drugs only
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Primary outcome
Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)
Comparator
Standard anti-diabetic drugs only
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study investigated the effects of vitamin D supplementation on glycemic control in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients. No significant differences were found between the vitamin D group and the standard anti-diabetic drugs group.
Understanding the role of vitamin D in diabetes management is crucial, especially as many patients seek complementary therapies. This study's findings suggest that vitamin D supplementation alone may not be effective in improving glycemic control in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients, which can guide clinicians in treatment planning and patient education.
Limited sample size may affect generalizability Short duration of the study may not capture long-term effects Lack of diverse population representation
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Alexander M, John RA, Kuldeep K, et al. Vitamin D Supplementation and Glycemic Control in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cureus. 2024;16(9):e70224. doi:10.7759/cureus.70224
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
No significant difference in HbA1c levels (p=0.263)
No significant change in fasting blood sugar levels (p=0.734)
No significant change in insulin resistance levels (p=0.899)
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Standard anti-diabetic drugs only, Vitamin D supplementation and Fasting blood sugar (FBS), Fasting insulin levels, Glucose iAUC (OGTT), and 2 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Standard anti-diabetic drugs only
Primary outcomes
Primary intervention
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
5
Related topics
10
Evidence pairs
582
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Standard anti-diabetic drugs only → Fasting blood sugar (FBS)
Standard anti-diabetic drugs only → Fasting blood sugar (FBS)
Evidence profile
Standard anti-diabetic drugs only → Fasting insulin levels
Standard anti-diabetic drugs only → Fasting insulin levels
Evidence profile
Standard anti-diabetic drugs only → Glucose iAUC (OGTT)
Standard anti-diabetic drugs only → Glucose iAUC (OGTT)
Evidence profile
Standard anti-diabetic drugs only → HbA1c
Standard anti-diabetic drugs only → HbA1c
Evidence profile
Standard anti-diabetic drugs only → Insulin resistance
Standard anti-diabetic drugs only → Insulin resistance
Evidence profile
Vitamin D supplementation → Fasting blood sugar (FBS)
Vitamin D supplementation → Fasting blood sugar (FBS)
Evidence profile
Vitamin D supplementation → Fasting insulin levels
Vitamin D supplementation → Fasting insulin levels
Evidence profile
Vitamin D supplementation → Glucose iAUC (OGTT)
Vitamin D supplementation → Glucose iAUC (OGTT)
Evidence profile
Vitamin D supplementation → HbA1c
Vitamin D supplementation → HbA1c
Evidence profile
Vitamin D supplementation → Insulin resistance
Vitamin D supplementation → Insulin resistance
Evidence profile
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Vitamin D supplementation and HbA1c, Vitamin D supplementation and Insulin Resistance.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring HbA1c
Measures HbA1c as a key outcome.
All studies on Vitamin D supplementation
Contributes to Vitamin D supplementation evidence base.
All studies measuring Insulin Resistance
Measures Insulin Resistance as a key outcome.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
5 results
4 results
5 results
5 results
4 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors appears to improve Postprandial and OGTT Glucose.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Glucose iAUC (OGTT)
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 35.5 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a small number of supporting studies and should be interpreted cautiously.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors for Insulin Resistance.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Fasting insulin levels
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 35.5 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Insulin resistance
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 35.5 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors for Fasting Glucose.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Fasting blood sugar (FBS)
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 35.5 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors for HbA1c.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 35.5 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.