HbA1c ReductionHybrid closed-loop system

Clinical evidence dossier

Hybrid closed-loop system

HbA1c

Evidence signal

Evidence signal

Strong

This is an authoritative evidence signal supplied by Clinical Reference. It is not a formal clinical grade, treatment recommendation, or pooled effect estimate.

Evidence snapshot

Authoritative support records
7
Supporting studies available for review
7
Randomized trials
7
Reported effects
9

Clinical conclusion

Hybrid closed-loop system shows a strong positive evidence signal for improving HbA1c across the studied comparisons.

Observed effects

Observed study estimates; not a pooled treatment effect.

Between-group effect

Absolute change

−0.9% to −0.4%

2 eligible estimates48–78 weeksObserved median: −0.65%

Change from baseline

Mean difference

−1.1% to −0.2%

2 eligible estimates26–52 weeksObserved median: −0.65%

Between-group effect

Mean difference

−1.24% to 0%

3 eligible estimates12–13 weeksObserved median: −0.6%

Between-group effect

Mean difference

−34 mmol/mol to −34 mmol/mol

1 eligible estimates13–13 weeksObserved median: −34 mmol/mol

Evidence composition

Non-randomized studies
0
Other designs
0
Unresolved designs
0
Magnitude-eligible effects
8

Consistency

Consistency classification

Consistent

Positive
7
No effect
0
Mixed
0
Negative
0

Population and applicability

Structured population data were available for 7 of 7 supporting studies. 7 studies described participants with type 1 diabetes. Age groups were heterogeneous: 3 studies with adult participants, 1 studies with youth participants.

This population information refers to the materialized supporting studies available for review. Omitted support records remain part of the authoritative support accounting and are available through the audit experience.

View reported population descriptions

These descriptions are reported across the supporting studies; they are not a single synthesized population.

  • Adults aged 18 and older with type 1 diabetes.
  • Individuals currently managing diabetes with insulin therapy.
  • Participants starting advanced hybrid closed-loop therapy.
  • Young individuals aged 12-25 with type 1 diabetes.
  • Patients currently using or considering automated insulin delivery systems.
  • Participants currently using insulin therapy.
  • Very young children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes.
  • Patients requiring insulin therapy for blood sugar management.
  • Adults with type 1 diabetes.
  • Individuals seeking alternatives to standard clinical practice.
  • Adults diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes.
  • Individuals currently using insulin pump therapy.

Limitations

  • Evidence uses heterogeneous comparison contexts: active_comparator, usual_care.

Supporting evidence

Inspect the authoritative studies and omitted support records for this dossier.

View supporting evidence