Hypoglycemic symptoms
Glargine U100 → Hypoglycemic symptoms
Glargine U100 → Hypoglycemic symptoms
Evidence profile
Key finding
Severe hypoglycemia occurred in 10 (0.8%) participants randomized to glargine.
This study evaluated the addition of glargine, glimepiride, liraglutide, or sitagliptin to metformin in type 2 diabetes. It found varying rates of hypoglycemia among the different treatments.
Evidence strength
Moderate confidence
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Extended (5–20+ y)
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
Population
Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes
Intervention
Glargine U100, Glimepiride, Liraglutide, Sitagliptin
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Extended (5–20+ y)
Primary outcome
Severe hypoglycemia
Evidence
Moderate confidence
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated the addition of glargine, glimepiride, liraglutide, or sitagliptin to metformin in type 2 diabetes. It found varying rates of hypoglycemia among the different treatments.
Understanding the risks of hypoglycemia associated with different diabetes medications is crucial for clinicians managing type 2 diabetes. This study highlights the need for careful consideration of treatment options to minimize adverse effects while effectively controlling blood sugar levels.
The study did not assess long-term outcomes. Sample sizes for each intervention group may limit generalizability. Effectiveness of interventions remains unclear due to mixed results.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Elizabeth RS, Lawrence SP, Alokananda G, et al. Addition of glargine, glimepiride, liraglutide, or sitagliptin to metformin in type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. PLOS ONE. 2024;19(11):e0309907. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0309907
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
Severe hypoglycemia occurred in 10 (0.8%) participants on glargine.
Severe hypoglycemia occurred in 16 (1.3%) participants on glimepiride.
Hypoglycemic symptoms were reported by 833 (68.3%) participants on glimepiride.
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Glargine U100, Glimepiride, Liraglutide, and 1 more and Hypoglycemic symptoms, Severe hypoglycemia.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Glargine U100
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
3
Related topics
8
Evidence pairs
63
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Glargine U100 → Hypoglycemic symptoms
Glargine U100 → Hypoglycemic symptoms
Evidence profile
Glargine U100 → Severe hypoglycemia
Glargine U100 → Severe hypoglycemia
Evidence profile
Glimepiride → Hypoglycemic symptoms
Glimepiride → Hypoglycemic symptoms
Evidence profile
Glimepiride → Severe hypoglycemia
Glimepiride → Severe hypoglycemia
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Hypoglycemic symptoms
Liraglutide → Hypoglycemic symptoms
Evidence profile
Liraglutide → Severe hypoglycemia
Liraglutide → Severe hypoglycemia
Evidence profile
Sitagliptin → Hypoglycemic symptoms
Sitagliptin → Hypoglycemic symptoms
Evidence profile
Sitagliptin → Severe hypoglycemia
Sitagliptin → Severe hypoglycemia
Evidence profile
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of DPP-4 Inhibitors for Hypoglycemia.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Hypoglycemic symptoms
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 49.1 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Severe hypoglycemia
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 31.5 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Sulfonylureas for Hypoglycemia.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Hypoglycemic symptoms
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 49.1 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Severe hypoglycemia
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 31.5 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 3 supporting studies and existing graph evidence signals.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Hypoglycemia.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Hypoglycemic symptoms
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 49.1 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Severe hypoglycemia
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 31.5 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 11 supporting studies and existing graph evidence signals.
Limitations
Glargine U100 appears to improve Hypoglycemic symptoms.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Hypoglycemic symptoms
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 49.1 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.